you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 98 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I think most people (including myself) prefer a minimal desktop by default, and then proceed to install only the software they need. Nevertheless, it always surprises me when I log in to a system that doesn't have vim.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    For almost all users, especially beginners, nano is just simpler faster and better. A lot of distributions are bundling it, and I am finding indeed systems without vim at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Especially for beginners, micro would be even better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [+] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago*

    I disagree. Don't get me wrong, vim is amazing and all that, but I think nano is easier for new users to grok out of the box, making it a better choice most of the time. What it lacks in features it makes up for in transparency.

    100% agree about the minimal set of desktop apps, though. That drives me crazy.

    Just my 0.02$.

    Edit: silly mistakes and clarification

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    In all distro I tried, I always found Vi.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    You've never used a minimal Linux distro for cloud servers then. Some don't ship any text editors. Others ship only nano. Part of the reason why I think learn vim because vi(m) is everywhere argument is retarded. It's factually incorrect.

  • source
  • parent