▲ 822 ▼ rule (thelemmy.club) submitted 4 days ago by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 16 points 4 days ago (2 children) Okay but, let’s be fair, not knowing the Nazis burned books on trans healthcare and research is not the same as denying the holocaust. I’m not saying she hasn’t denied the holocaust. I’m just saying this isn’t an example of that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 days ago* (1 child) Shes denying part of the holocaust. Whether that be from ignorance or otherwise idk and idc. Denying part of the holocaust is definitionally holocaust denial. Thats litterally the defining trait of the word permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 1 point 3 days ago (1 child) Denying part of the holocaust is definitionally holocaust denial. It really isn’t “definitionally” Holocaust denial. “Holocaust denial” as a linguist concept as understood by most people has nothing at all to do with denying the burning of trans literature. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) "Deniers assert that the Holocaust is a fabrication or exaggeration,^[3][4][5]^making one or more of the following false claims:" and then an incomplete list of holocaust denialist claims. Thats from your own link J K Rowling is claiming the holocaust is exaggereted in them tweets, therefore: denying part of the holocaust as defined by the above. and holocaust denial is an academic term with a pretty precise definition, as much as it is a colloqial one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 days ago (1 child) There's also a difference between not knowing something and implying that something is a lie (and sending that implication out to her millions of Twitter followers). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago Oh absolutely, I agree 100%. All I’m saying is that this wasn’t an example of holocaust denial. That doesn’t mean it wasn’t ignorant and shitty. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 days ago* (1 child) Shes denying part of the holocaust. Whether that be from ignorance or otherwise idk and idc. Denying part of the holocaust is definitionally holocaust denial. Thats litterally the defining trait of the word permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 1 point 3 days ago (1 child) Denying part of the holocaust is definitionally holocaust denial. It really isn’t “definitionally” Holocaust denial. “Holocaust denial” as a linguist concept as understood by most people has nothing at all to do with denying the burning of trans literature. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) "Deniers assert that the Holocaust is a fabrication or exaggeration,^[3][4][5]^making one or more of the following false claims:" and then an incomplete list of holocaust denialist claims. Thats from your own link J K Rowling is claiming the holocaust is exaggereted in them tweets, therefore: denying part of the holocaust as defined by the above. and holocaust denial is an academic term with a pretty precise definition, as much as it is a colloqial one. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 1 point 3 days ago (1 child) Denying part of the holocaust is definitionally holocaust denial. It really isn’t “definitionally” Holocaust denial. “Holocaust denial” as a linguist concept as understood by most people has nothing at all to do with denying the burning of trans literature. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) "Deniers assert that the Holocaust is a fabrication or exaggeration,^[3][4][5]^making one or more of the following false claims:" and then an incomplete list of holocaust denialist claims. Thats from your own link J K Rowling is claiming the holocaust is exaggereted in them tweets, therefore: denying part of the holocaust as defined by the above. and holocaust denial is an academic term with a pretty precise definition, as much as it is a colloqial one. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) "Deniers assert that the Holocaust is a fabrication or exaggeration,^[3][4][5]^making one or more of the following false claims:" and then an incomplete list of holocaust denialist claims. Thats from your own link J K Rowling is claiming the holocaust is exaggereted in them tweets, therefore: denying part of the holocaust as defined by the above. and holocaust denial is an academic term with a pretty precise definition, as much as it is a colloqial one. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 days ago (1 child) There's also a difference between not knowing something and implying that something is a lie (and sending that implication out to her millions of Twitter followers). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago Oh absolutely, I agree 100%. All I’m saying is that this wasn’t an example of holocaust denial. That doesn’t mean it wasn’t ignorant and shitty. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago Oh absolutely, I agree 100%. All I’m saying is that this wasn’t an example of holocaust denial. That doesn’t mean it wasn’t ignorant and shitty. permalink fedilink source parent
