▲ 515 ▼ Parking garage in Stockholm using floor numbers as artwork in an interesting way. (thelemmy.club) submitted 4 days ago by stoy@lemmy.zip to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world 46 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] jwt@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago (12 children) Not if you look outside from within the building. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 6 points 4 days ago (7 children) .. They're symmetrical, they look the same from both directions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (5 children) But 4 and 6 are read edge-in, and the others are read middle-out. The mirroring is inconsistent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 3 points 4 days ago (4 children) Yes, but looking at them from the inside wouldn't change that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago* (3 children) No, each pair looks the same whether you’re viewing them while standing inside or out on the street. To read the numbers so that they are correctly oriented, you’d read from the middle of a given pair outward for 1, 2, 3, and 5. But to read 4 and 6, you’d read from the edge inwards. Or (viewing from outside or inside) the second number in the pair is not reversed for 1, 2, 3, and 5. The first number is not reversed for 4 and 6. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 4 days ago (2 children) I'm perfectly aware of all of this, this has nothing to do with my comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) Damn, you’re right. I misread what you wrote. I thought you were asking if it would be different from the inside. But that’s clearly not what you wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 3 days ago No worries! I appreciate the acknowledgement :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] jwt@programming.dev 1 point 4 days ago Ah yes you're right. I was thinking about the numbers individually. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Glowstick@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (3 children) Oh, very interesting point. Either way some of them are backwards which is a shame for a cool design idea like this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] jwt@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children) Yeah cool design nevertheless. Found some pictures from within, they picked one of the 'wrong' floors for those shots, hehe: https://www.sosbrutalism.org/cms/18741632 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Unparkable permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago !youcantparktheremate@feddit.uk permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anguo@piefed.ca 6 points 4 days ago (7 children) .. They're symmetrical, they look the same from both directions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (5 children) But 4 and 6 are read edge-in, and the others are read middle-out. The mirroring is inconsistent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 3 points 4 days ago (4 children) Yes, but looking at them from the inside wouldn't change that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago* (3 children) No, each pair looks the same whether you’re viewing them while standing inside or out on the street. To read the numbers so that they are correctly oriented, you’d read from the middle of a given pair outward for 1, 2, 3, and 5. But to read 4 and 6, you’d read from the edge inwards. Or (viewing from outside or inside) the second number in the pair is not reversed for 1, 2, 3, and 5. The first number is not reversed for 4 and 6. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 4 days ago (2 children) I'm perfectly aware of all of this, this has nothing to do with my comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) Damn, you’re right. I misread what you wrote. I thought you were asking if it would be different from the inside. But that’s clearly not what you wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 3 days ago No worries! I appreciate the acknowledgement :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] jwt@programming.dev 1 point 4 days ago Ah yes you're right. I was thinking about the numbers individually. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (5 children) But 4 and 6 are read edge-in, and the others are read middle-out. The mirroring is inconsistent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 3 points 4 days ago (4 children) Yes, but looking at them from the inside wouldn't change that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago* (3 children) No, each pair looks the same whether you’re viewing them while standing inside or out on the street. To read the numbers so that they are correctly oriented, you’d read from the middle of a given pair outward for 1, 2, 3, and 5. But to read 4 and 6, you’d read from the edge inwards. Or (viewing from outside or inside) the second number in the pair is not reversed for 1, 2, 3, and 5. The first number is not reversed for 4 and 6. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 4 days ago (2 children) I'm perfectly aware of all of this, this has nothing to do with my comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) Damn, you’re right. I misread what you wrote. I thought you were asking if it would be different from the inside. But that’s clearly not what you wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 3 days ago No worries! I appreciate the acknowledgement :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anguo@piefed.ca 3 points 4 days ago (4 children) Yes, but looking at them from the inside wouldn't change that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago* (3 children) No, each pair looks the same whether you’re viewing them while standing inside or out on the street. To read the numbers so that they are correctly oriented, you’d read from the middle of a given pair outward for 1, 2, 3, and 5. But to read 4 and 6, you’d read from the edge inwards. Or (viewing from outside or inside) the second number in the pair is not reversed for 1, 2, 3, and 5. The first number is not reversed for 4 and 6. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 4 days ago (2 children) I'm perfectly aware of all of this, this has nothing to do with my comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) Damn, you’re right. I misread what you wrote. I thought you were asking if it would be different from the inside. But that’s clearly not what you wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 3 days ago No worries! I appreciate the acknowledgement :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago* (3 children) No, each pair looks the same whether you’re viewing them while standing inside or out on the street. To read the numbers so that they are correctly oriented, you’d read from the middle of a given pair outward for 1, 2, 3, and 5. But to read 4 and 6, you’d read from the edge inwards. Or (viewing from outside or inside) the second number in the pair is not reversed for 1, 2, 3, and 5. The first number is not reversed for 4 and 6. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 4 days ago (2 children) I'm perfectly aware of all of this, this has nothing to do with my comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) Damn, you’re right. I misread what you wrote. I thought you were asking if it would be different from the inside. But that’s clearly not what you wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 3 days ago No worries! I appreciate the acknowledgement :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 4 days ago (2 children) I'm perfectly aware of all of this, this has nothing to do with my comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) Damn, you’re right. I misread what you wrote. I thought you were asking if it would be different from the inside. But that’s clearly not what you wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 3 days ago No worries! I appreciate the acknowledgement :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) Damn, you’re right. I misread what you wrote. I thought you were asking if it would be different from the inside. But that’s clearly not what you wrote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 3 days ago No worries! I appreciate the acknowledgement :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 3 days ago No worries! I appreciate the acknowledgement :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jwt@programming.dev 1 point 4 days ago Ah yes you're right. I was thinking about the numbers individually. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Glowstick@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (3 children) Oh, very interesting point. Either way some of them are backwards which is a shame for a cool design idea like this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] jwt@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children) Yeah cool design nevertheless. Found some pictures from within, they picked one of the 'wrong' floors for those shots, hehe: https://www.sosbrutalism.org/cms/18741632 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Unparkable permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago !youcantparktheremate@feddit.uk permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jwt@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children) Yeah cool design nevertheless. Found some pictures from within, they picked one of the 'wrong' floors for those shots, hehe: https://www.sosbrutalism.org/cms/18741632 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Unparkable permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago !youcantparktheremate@feddit.uk permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Unparkable permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago !youcantparktheremate@feddit.uk permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago !youcantparktheremate@feddit.uk permalink fedilink source parent