▲ 448 ▼ consent rule (thelemmy.club) submitted 1 day ago by Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone 107 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 1 point 16 hours ago (1 child) you dont get to sacrifice peoples bodily autonomy because it might be good for fucking society. Just curious, what's your position on vaccinations? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 15 hours ago vaccines are great and awesome and i wish there were more and i could get them. no one is being forced against their will to get vaccinated. people who refuse for nonmedical reasons are a danger to others, directly, not in some hypothetical society might be better off way. just like someone else who brought up smoking which also harms others directly. they should be barred from certain places for not getting them yeah. that doesnt violate their bodily autonomy. they can choose not to they just wont be able to do certain things or go certain places because they are a danger to others. you can choose to smoke you just wont be allowed to do it where you will hurt people. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 15 hours ago vaccines are great and awesome and i wish there were more and i could get them. no one is being forced against their will to get vaccinated. people who refuse for nonmedical reasons are a danger to others, directly, not in some hypothetical society might be better off way. just like someone else who brought up smoking which also harms others directly. they should be barred from certain places for not getting them yeah. that doesnt violate their bodily autonomy. they can choose not to they just wont be able to do certain things or go certain places because they are a danger to others. you can choose to smoke you just wont be allowed to do it where you will hurt people. permalink fedilink source parent