▲ 951 ▼ The cure! (thelemmy.club) submitted 2 days ago by LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone to c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 13 points 1 day ago (2 children) That shit comes from phrenology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 day ago (1 child) I hate phrenology, for the obvious reasons, but also because it makes people scared to death to discuss any kind of bone structure differences between regional groups. I remember when Elizabeth Warren was getting flack for lying about being part Native American. The "high cheekbones" comment got a lot of derision, despite being a fairly tame comment outside of the lying. Not saying it's useful in a biological sense, just in colloquial speak. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago The problem with phrenology is linking bone structure with behavior. But it's stupid not discussing bone structure for a pseudoscience. permalink fedilink source parent [–] chunk6235@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Nah, this is just basic biological racism. It wouldn't be phrenology until they were making arguments that the shape or the lumps on his head made him stupid/insane/an insatiable raping machine/some other dumb bullshit. Somehow, biological racism isn't nearly as stupid as phrenology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 child) No, it is just as stupid, racist, and grounded in as much verifiable science but this is a rectangle/square conversation. Phrenology is a subsect of biological racism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chunk6235@piefed.social 1 point 1 day ago but this is a rectangle/square conversation. Phrenology is a subsect of biological racism. True, but the situation described was that PoCs have an internal defect making them "lesser", not that the shape of a person's head can determine their abilities or characteristics. I have no issue with limping them together generally, but the specific situation is not phrenology. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 day ago (1 child) I hate phrenology, for the obvious reasons, but also because it makes people scared to death to discuss any kind of bone structure differences between regional groups. I remember when Elizabeth Warren was getting flack for lying about being part Native American. The "high cheekbones" comment got a lot of derision, despite being a fairly tame comment outside of the lying. Not saying it's useful in a biological sense, just in colloquial speak. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago The problem with phrenology is linking bone structure with behavior. But it's stupid not discussing bone structure for a pseudoscience. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago The problem with phrenology is linking bone structure with behavior. But it's stupid not discussing bone structure for a pseudoscience. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chunk6235@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago* (1 child) Nah, this is just basic biological racism. It wouldn't be phrenology until they were making arguments that the shape or the lumps on his head made him stupid/insane/an insatiable raping machine/some other dumb bullshit. Somehow, biological racism isn't nearly as stupid as phrenology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 child) No, it is just as stupid, racist, and grounded in as much verifiable science but this is a rectangle/square conversation. Phrenology is a subsect of biological racism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chunk6235@piefed.social 1 point 1 day ago but this is a rectangle/square conversation. Phrenology is a subsect of biological racism. True, but the situation described was that PoCs have an internal defect making them "lesser", not that the shape of a person's head can determine their abilities or characteristics. I have no issue with limping them together generally, but the specific situation is not phrenology. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 child) No, it is just as stupid, racist, and grounded in as much verifiable science but this is a rectangle/square conversation. Phrenology is a subsect of biological racism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chunk6235@piefed.social 1 point 1 day ago but this is a rectangle/square conversation. Phrenology is a subsect of biological racism. True, but the situation described was that PoCs have an internal defect making them "lesser", not that the shape of a person's head can determine their abilities or characteristics. I have no issue with limping them together generally, but the specific situation is not phrenology. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chunk6235@piefed.social 1 point 1 day ago but this is a rectangle/square conversation. Phrenology is a subsect of biological racism. True, but the situation described was that PoCs have an internal defect making them "lesser", not that the shape of a person's head can determine their abilities or characteristics. I have no issue with limping them together generally, but the specific situation is not phrenology. permalink fedilink source parent