Technology

parent

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

How do you figure that?

It's literally spelled out in the submitted article as well as https://www.xda-developers.com/linus-torvalds-will-loudly-ignore-anyone-criticising-ai-code-in-linux-fork-it-or-just-walk-away/ which is prominently linked from that article. Read first, comment later, don't downvote others just because you are wrong.

parent

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world -1 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

That just explains Torval’s attitude, which I just explained to you first (by the way) but it doesn’t explain your statement that “all of Linux is now poisoned“.

That’s gonna require a substantial amount more proof than a philosophical position taken by Linus Torvalds

(to be clear: I’m pretty anti AI myself, and I don’t agree with Torvalds position, and I’m definitely not arguing in Support of it)

parent

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 child)

That’s gonna require a substantial amount more proof than a philosophical position taken by Linus Torvalds

"Linus Torvalds used AI to fix a Linux bug" <-- literally spelled out in the headline.

1600 commits contain the word "claude" alone: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Atorvalds%2Flinux+claude&type=commits

It's so easy to find out, yet you insist that you are right. Hilarious.

parent

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world -1 points 1 week ago

The only thing that’s “hilarious“ here is how you’ve interpreted one thing to fit into your perception of another.

On the other hand, I find it rather sad, especially how, in a single sentence, you seem to see several things that just… aren’t there….

And I get the argument that you’re trying to make, but you’re making it very badly.