109
US judge ruled AI-generated child sexual abuse material is protected by First Amendment. (reason.com)
submitted 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) by to c/technology@lemmy.world
39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1368970/judge-ruled-ai-generated-child-sex-abuse-material-is-protected-by-first-amendment

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 7 hours ago (1 child)

Evidence? You mean other than the extensive research, clinical tests, personal stories and confessions of offenders?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 5 hours ago* (1 child)

    Anything's possible when you make shit up. You don't have research to support the claim that viewing any sort of pornographic material leads to behaviors depicted in that material, personal stories and confessions are not even close to the same thing as research and the fact that you bothered listing them together tells me that you're a fucking moron

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    Oh wow. You seem to be awfully enraged about this. You must have some personal investment in people being allowed to view specific types of "pornographic material". Well, don't let something like facts or common sense get in the way of your crusade.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent