you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child)

You switched gears in the middle of your statement. Either photography from the public spaces is legal or it isn't. The only reason I don't consider these take-downs a first-amendment violation is because Google is providing the mechanism to do it. They legally have every right to take the picture of your house and tell you to go pound sand if you don't like it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    I mean.... Sure. I'm not in disagreement with that. And people are welcome to not appreciate a corporation doing that, and use the takedown to remove it if they dont want it there

    I do understand that Google can legally take pictures of whatever is public

  • source
  • parent