you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Feel a bit dumb saying this since it's apparently been around 30years but I've never heard of this.

Any comments on the user experience? Before you tell me to just install Linux, I have on some of my systems but I have a lot of specialty peripherals and work software that I've never been able to get to run properly on Linux distros on my main desktop and the laptop experience still feels like a compromise to me.

What are some downsides of using this over windows?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 15 hours ago (1 child)

    As I understand it, it's supposed to be a from-the-ground-up reimplementation of NT5 / Windows 2000 with maybe a handful of later tech squeezed in. Historically, it has borrowed heavily from the WINE project, though I'm not sure of the current state of play. It would certainly make sense to have continued to do so.

    It's intended to be compatible with any and all Windows software, but the goalposts keep moving and the number of steps they are behind increases faster still. At this point it's barely more than a passion project for the devs, though many of us really want them to succeed.

    (See also Haiku, which is a reimplementation and advancement of the contemporaneous BeOS.)

    I've occasionally tried to get ReactOS to run in a VM for the nostalgia and to see something like the screenshots, but it never seems to work for me, not that I've tried this new version yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments