you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 163 points 5 days ago (4 children)

this article is better written:

https://science.report/discover/quantum-gravimeter-demonstrates-gps-free-navigation-in-coral-sea-trial-86654/

it maintained bounded position accuracy within 1 nautical mile over an 83-kilometer trajectory. This performance, achieved without access to satellite navigation, represents a more than tenfold improvement over standard navigation-grade inertial backup systems under similar conditions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    That’s better, thank you

    As a holder of a spatial degree I found it difficult to directly compare it favourably to GNSS. Even a simple binary code calculating a position with GNSS gives sub 10-20 metre accuracy, generally closer to 2 or 3.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    I don't think it's meant to be better than GNSS in terms of accuracy, just better in terms of reliability because it works entirely standalone without a need for satellite

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments