1050
Please discuss. (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/memes@lemmy.ml
139 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 28 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I'm here for this energy

Okay hear me out, what about the peanut butter on one axis (either conventional sandwich, or this rotated 90 degrees) and the jelly as it is here

What are we dealing with then? This might transcend the cube system of food categorisation.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The Cube Rule is the most definitive and authoritative categorization of food topology I have encountered. I refer to it often in food related arguments.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    But what is the abomination I've described? I don't think it fits.

    I'm not ready for a world where the cube rule isn't all encompassing

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Although the bagel half on the bottom and the top are split toroids, topologically they are flat (you can 'deform' it into a flat plane if you squish it). This is assuming it hasn't been cut down the center as well.

    The filling of PB&J is between the two starches. Therefore this is Food Type 2: Sandwich.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Okay but, what about down the centre as well? I think this is where the paved road ends

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It is still a Type II sandwich, just that the middle portion is air.

    In crappy text form it's equivalent to:

    Bread

    PB&J | Air | PB&J

    Bread

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Okay so I think I'm failing miserably at articulating quite the monstrosity I've imagined. For illustrative purposes:

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ah I see. This looks a bit different than OP's image. This requires further research in food cube science.

    I do believe this configuration that you listed could be a new sub-Type of food topology. It combines four starches with filling in between, as two Type II sandwiches orthogonally configured.

    Since you can theoretically make modifications like this to the other Types, it might be easier to make these new configurations subtypes of the main categories instead of making a Type VII (we should reserve these for 4D foods).

    This particular case is a biaxial Type IIa sandwich.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •