▲ 457 ▼ YouTube Premium is getting yet another price hike for users across the globe (www.dexerto.com) submitted 1 month ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world 239 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (51 children) Do people really pay for this? permalink fedilink source hideshow 51 child comments replies: [–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 month ago (4 children) Yes. But mostly because I know that my view pays the creators I watch orders of magnitude more that an ad based view Being ad free is just a bonus I don't really notice because I have ad blockers anyway permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] warm@kbin.earth 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) I'd rather give to creators directly than give Google a cut. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago I just do both permalink fedilink source parent [–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Fair point, never considered the creator revenue. My regular channels I'm part of their Patreon, but they are channels I learn from, makers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago That's just an additional thing for me. I spend around 100 bucks a month on patreon, but it's just not possible to do that with all channels I watch Oh, and nebula of course permalink fedilink source parent [–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (9 children) I make a list of things to learn. Get a 30 day trial and download every single video related, then cancel. I am on email #8 doing this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children) Only an email address? I have have no shit maybe 50 email addy's for reddit for all my bans. I collect bans like its my job on that shit site. They are getting crafty, I figured out the latest tracking and a lazy work around. Next will be a VM, I know that will make it easier. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 5 points 1 month ago (2 children) i love you for doing this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments load more comments (2 replies) [–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (2 children) I have to ask, how are you getting around Google's identity verification system? The last couple times I tried to make a fake Google account, it's wanted an actual phone number. Not a virtual number, an actual phone number. So I'm curious what you are doing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) I am not creating new accounts, just reusing ones I have had for years created before all these phone verification bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 month ago darn, okay, well thanks for the response lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] burido@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Wait until you hear about Libretube, pipepipe, newpipe or any other Youtube OS alternatives out there permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] burido@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Better yet with LibreTube you can remove shorts and download 1080p or higher permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (3 children) I have kids and parents who watch a lot of YouTube and I don’t want them watching ads, nor do I want to deal with helping them avoid ads in more creative ways. And the (per-person) price of a family plan isn’t as bad as an individual plan. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (2 children) paying to not watch ads, means you pay more and more to watch ads. the problem with ads, is people are paying to not watch them which enforced charging more. it's a cycle of abuse and you have Stockholm syndrome as a result. break free.. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) in theory: that’s correct in practice: I’m not picking this battle (for now, at least) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago I understand the whole thing. just be happy permalink fedilink source parent [–] Humanius@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* I used to have YouTube Premium. The main reason for paying for it was that I don't like having to sit through ads. A nice benefit of Premium over ad-blockers was that a part of the revenue from YouTube premium goes to creators in lieu of advertising revenue. YouTube gets money for running the service, the creators get money for making videos, and I don't have to watch ads. I stopped my Premium subscription not because it was getting too expensive, but because YouTube is an American company. Ever since Trump got elected for a second time I have been progressively working on cutting out products and services by American tech giants from my life, and YouTube Premium was a very easy one to cut out. These days I just use an ad-blocker. If the creators want revenue from my view, they can upload to a platform that isn't YouTube. permalink fedilink source parent [–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago Plenty. I don't imagine ads cover the huge cost of hosting video in this day and age, especially with all the adblockers running around ( saw an ad revenue number in a study a while ago, google supposedly makes between 100s-10000s dollars per person, depending on their "value" ). I for one am grateful to all the paying subscribers - it means google will more readily tolerate my shiny freeloading adblocking ass. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago (8 children) I pay for YouTube Music and premium gets thrown in for free. Why? It's mostly momentum. I used Groove back when that was a thing, and when it folded I could migrate my playlists to YouTube so it was easy and than $10 a month. Now it's $30 but it's still like buying a cd a month. I am slowly de-googling and some month will stop using the service. It just hasn't been a top priority. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago Ah so they bundle it in if you want it/use it that jives as they can bolster the "numbers" for a service no one is seeking out. permalink fedilink source parent [–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (4 children) If you did this, you'd have like 20 CD's by the end of the year (way more id you can find used ones) that you completely own and no one can pull the license for later. Ripping them is easy and allows you to play them anywhere, even without internet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago I can stream more than 20cds worth from a catalog far more expansive than anything I could dream to store. It's simply worth the money for my usage. Moreover, I don't want to store anything locally, physically or otherwise. I'm ok with the risk of them pulling licensing, because after over a decade and a half of usage it's been an issue thats come up fewer than 5 times, and each time there was an alternative track/release available (i.e. part of a newer album or rerecorded). permalink fedilink source parent [–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago I don't disagree with you. But I have a lot of CDs already :) The rationale for me is that it's all available. I watched a Billy Joel documentary recently (I know 🙄) but it made do a listen through his discography. I'm glad I didn't buy those. It turns out I already knew the songs I liked and discovered 0 enjoyable deep cuts. But even at $15 a disc that would have been a $200 play through. And yes I'm aware of the high seas and the library. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago While true, I don't have to do any work at all right now to listen to as much music as I want and new music is available immediately. I also don't have to setup something to be able to stream music remotely so that I don't have to store all of it on my space limited device. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] adarza@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Now it's $30 but it's still like buying a cd a month. it's about twice as much as a mainstream cd at a brick-and-mortar or a random sampling of physical disc offerings at bandcamp. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago But I don't want random bandcamp samplings. I mean I like new music and go to a lot of Indy shows, but I want the ability to hear a song I like and then do a deep listen to the artist without committing to CDs or a trip to the library if it's available. permalink fedilink source parent [–] zewm@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (3 children) I do. The benefits are worth it to me. It is my main source of video consumption. Ads removed on iOS without having to do work around is great. Not throttling me for using an ad blocker on desktop is also nice. Contributions to content creators I watch. Access to YouTube music which I use in my car. For me it’s worth. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] verifiedbyme@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) uBlock Lite is now available as an extension for Safari. I’m not sure what the Lite is about and saw other people complain about it, but for the past month Youtube on iOS has been a lovely experience for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zewm@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago That requires using YouTube through the browser. I use the YouTube app. It’s a different dynamic. permalink fedilink source parent [–] horse@feddit.org 1 point 1 month ago Check out "Unwatched for YouTube" on iOS. It's a bit janky, but it works. Certainly better than paying for premium. permalink fedilink source parent [–] magnue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago If you're going to be paying for a music streaming service, you may as well go for YT premium as you get other things for barely any extra cost. Otherwise I don't see the value. I'm in the process of going local and replacing YT music though. permalink fedilink source parent [–] warm@kbin.earth 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) Lots. That's why the price is going up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago HAHA great point! permalink fedilink source parent [–] _spiffy@piefed.ca 4 points 1 month ago I do. Years ago it was just google family stuff. I share it with my parents and wife and sisters. We have a decent library of shared movies(we don't buy those anymore) and we all use YouTube music. Ad free YouTube is a perk to it. If we cancel, we all lose it and I'm sure Google would not let us be a family scattered around the country. Splitting the cost makes it worthwhile, we watch a good amount of YouTube and we enjoy our kids can also watch stuff on the tv ad free. permalink fedilink source parent [–] __hetz@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago I stopped paying however many years ago it was that they killed Play Music. YouTube Premium was just a benefit to a music service I felt was worth the money. Once they sucked all the humanity and soul out of Play Music and pushed YouTube Music on everyone, I bounced. Been using NewPipe on mobile, TubeArchivist and Jellyfin at home for videos I want to retain and watch on my TV or whatever. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stumu415@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) I rarely use YouTube. Maybe twice a year using a separate android app so no ads or other shit. So for me this total obsession with YT is beyond me. What on earth do you watch everyday? permalink fedilink source parent [–] john117@piefed.jmsquared.net 3 points 1 month ago I pay 24 bucks a month for the family plan, as it's my most used platform. I get youtube music and no ads on YouTube, while sharing the benefits with 5 other family members. so, about 4 bucks I'm paying a month per person. I'm okay with the price permalink fedilink source parent [–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (4 children) Yes. I’m lazy and watch a lot of YouTube. I cannot deal with ads. That said, I have prime video through Amazon prime and it asks for, like, $4 per month to skip ads. I stopped watching prime video because of this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) And they wonder why torrents just won't go away... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago IPTV too. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) i just use ublock origin for youtube ads, they havnt done anything to stop the adblockers yet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago I don’t watch in browser mostly. Else I would do this too. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children) I use YouTube Music, and get Premium with it. Other people pay for Spotify, and don't. Plus they also have to actually use Spotify instead, which is like a double negative. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) YT has made the non subscriber experience for music so bad I wouldn't consider it. Minimize the browser to check msgs and music stops, so dang annoying. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago this... it's a horrid experience without paying so why the hell would I ever pay.. that and I know the price goes up with features being removed. I'll continue to subscribe to nothing permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nighed@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago I accept that if I block adverts in add supported content that's a problem. The creators get a cut of the money (way more than ads get them!) and accept most goes to Google because Youtube is hella expensive to run. ... if it gets ridiculously expensive then I will find somewhere else. I keep meaning to try Nebula.... permalink fedilink source parent [–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago apparently yes, so they dont see ADS. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 month ago (4 children) Yes. But mostly because I know that my view pays the creators I watch orders of magnitude more that an ad based view Being ad free is just a bonus I don't really notice because I have ad blockers anyway permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] warm@kbin.earth 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) I'd rather give to creators directly than give Google a cut. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago I just do both permalink fedilink source parent [–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Fair point, never considered the creator revenue. My regular channels I'm part of their Patreon, but they are channels I learn from, makers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago That's just an additional thing for me. I spend around 100 bucks a month on patreon, but it's just not possible to do that with all channels I watch Oh, and nebula of course permalink fedilink source parent
[–] warm@kbin.earth 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) I'd rather give to creators directly than give Google a cut. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago I just do both permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Fair point, never considered the creator revenue. My regular channels I'm part of their Patreon, but they are channels I learn from, makers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago That's just an additional thing for me. I spend around 100 bucks a month on patreon, but it's just not possible to do that with all channels I watch Oh, and nebula of course permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago That's just an additional thing for me. I spend around 100 bucks a month on patreon, but it's just not possible to do that with all channels I watch Oh, and nebula of course permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (9 children) I make a list of things to learn. Get a 30 day trial and download every single video related, then cancel. I am on email #8 doing this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children) Only an email address? I have have no shit maybe 50 email addy's for reddit for all my bans. I collect bans like its my job on that shit site. They are getting crafty, I figured out the latest tracking and a lazy work around. Next will be a VM, I know that will make it easier. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 5 points 1 month ago (2 children) i love you for doing this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments load more comments (2 replies) [–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (2 children) I have to ask, how are you getting around Google's identity verification system? The last couple times I tried to make a fake Google account, it's wanted an actual phone number. Not a virtual number, an actual phone number. So I'm curious what you are doing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) I am not creating new accounts, just reusing ones I have had for years created before all these phone verification bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 month ago darn, okay, well thanks for the response lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] burido@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Wait until you hear about Libretube, pipepipe, newpipe or any other Youtube OS alternatives out there permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] burido@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Better yet with LibreTube you can remove shorts and download 1080p or higher permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children) Only an email address? I have have no shit maybe 50 email addy's for reddit for all my bans. I collect bans like its my job on that shit site. They are getting crafty, I figured out the latest tracking and a lazy work around. Next will be a VM, I know that will make it easier. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 5 points 1 month ago (2 children) i love you for doing this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 5 points 1 month ago (2 children) i love you for doing this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (2 children) I have to ask, how are you getting around Google's identity verification system? The last couple times I tried to make a fake Google account, it's wanted an actual phone number. Not a virtual number, an actual phone number. So I'm curious what you are doing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) I am not creating new accounts, just reusing ones I have had for years created before all these phone verification bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 month ago darn, okay, well thanks for the response lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) I am not creating new accounts, just reusing ones I have had for years created before all these phone verification bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 month ago darn, okay, well thanks for the response lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 month ago darn, okay, well thanks for the response lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] burido@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Wait until you hear about Libretube, pipepipe, newpipe or any other Youtube OS alternatives out there permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] burido@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Better yet with LibreTube you can remove shorts and download 1080p or higher permalink fedilink source parent
[–] burido@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Better yet with LibreTube you can remove shorts and download 1080p or higher permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (3 children) I have kids and parents who watch a lot of YouTube and I don’t want them watching ads, nor do I want to deal with helping them avoid ads in more creative ways. And the (per-person) price of a family plan isn’t as bad as an individual plan. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (2 children) paying to not watch ads, means you pay more and more to watch ads. the problem with ads, is people are paying to not watch them which enforced charging more. it's a cycle of abuse and you have Stockholm syndrome as a result. break free.. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) in theory: that’s correct in practice: I’m not picking this battle (for now, at least) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago I understand the whole thing. just be happy permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (2 children) paying to not watch ads, means you pay more and more to watch ads. the problem with ads, is people are paying to not watch them which enforced charging more. it's a cycle of abuse and you have Stockholm syndrome as a result. break free.. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) in theory: that’s correct in practice: I’m not picking this battle (for now, at least) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago I understand the whole thing. just be happy permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) in theory: that’s correct in practice: I’m not picking this battle (for now, at least) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago I understand the whole thing. just be happy permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago I understand the whole thing. just be happy permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* I used to have YouTube Premium. The main reason for paying for it was that I don't like having to sit through ads. A nice benefit of Premium over ad-blockers was that a part of the revenue from YouTube premium goes to creators in lieu of advertising revenue. YouTube gets money for running the service, the creators get money for making videos, and I don't have to watch ads. I stopped my Premium subscription not because it was getting too expensive, but because YouTube is an American company. Ever since Trump got elected for a second time I have been progressively working on cutting out products and services by American tech giants from my life, and YouTube Premium was a very easy one to cut out. These days I just use an ad-blocker. If the creators want revenue from my view, they can upload to a platform that isn't YouTube. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago Plenty. I don't imagine ads cover the huge cost of hosting video in this day and age, especially with all the adblockers running around ( saw an ad revenue number in a study a while ago, google supposedly makes between 100s-10000s dollars per person, depending on their "value" ). I for one am grateful to all the paying subscribers - it means google will more readily tolerate my shiny freeloading adblocking ass. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago (8 children) I pay for YouTube Music and premium gets thrown in for free. Why? It's mostly momentum. I used Groove back when that was a thing, and when it folded I could migrate my playlists to YouTube so it was easy and than $10 a month. Now it's $30 but it's still like buying a cd a month. I am slowly de-googling and some month will stop using the service. It just hasn't been a top priority. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago Ah so they bundle it in if you want it/use it that jives as they can bolster the "numbers" for a service no one is seeking out. permalink fedilink source parent [–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (4 children) If you did this, you'd have like 20 CD's by the end of the year (way more id you can find used ones) that you completely own and no one can pull the license for later. Ripping them is easy and allows you to play them anywhere, even without internet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago I can stream more than 20cds worth from a catalog far more expansive than anything I could dream to store. It's simply worth the money for my usage. Moreover, I don't want to store anything locally, physically or otherwise. I'm ok with the risk of them pulling licensing, because after over a decade and a half of usage it's been an issue thats come up fewer than 5 times, and each time there was an alternative track/release available (i.e. part of a newer album or rerecorded). permalink fedilink source parent [–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago I don't disagree with you. But I have a lot of CDs already :) The rationale for me is that it's all available. I watched a Billy Joel documentary recently (I know 🙄) but it made do a listen through his discography. I'm glad I didn't buy those. It turns out I already knew the songs I liked and discovered 0 enjoyable deep cuts. But even at $15 a disc that would have been a $200 play through. And yes I'm aware of the high seas and the library. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago While true, I don't have to do any work at all right now to listen to as much music as I want and new music is available immediately. I also don't have to setup something to be able to stream music remotely so that I don't have to store all of it on my space limited device. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] adarza@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Now it's $30 but it's still like buying a cd a month. it's about twice as much as a mainstream cd at a brick-and-mortar or a random sampling of physical disc offerings at bandcamp. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago But I don't want random bandcamp samplings. I mean I like new music and go to a lot of Indy shows, but I want the ability to hear a song I like and then do a deep listen to the artist without committing to CDs or a trip to the library if it's available. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago Ah so they bundle it in if you want it/use it that jives as they can bolster the "numbers" for a service no one is seeking out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (4 children) If you did this, you'd have like 20 CD's by the end of the year (way more id you can find used ones) that you completely own and no one can pull the license for later. Ripping them is easy and allows you to play them anywhere, even without internet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago I can stream more than 20cds worth from a catalog far more expansive than anything I could dream to store. It's simply worth the money for my usage. Moreover, I don't want to store anything locally, physically or otherwise. I'm ok with the risk of them pulling licensing, because after over a decade and a half of usage it's been an issue thats come up fewer than 5 times, and each time there was an alternative track/release available (i.e. part of a newer album or rerecorded). permalink fedilink source parent [–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago I don't disagree with you. But I have a lot of CDs already :) The rationale for me is that it's all available. I watched a Billy Joel documentary recently (I know 🙄) but it made do a listen through his discography. I'm glad I didn't buy those. It turns out I already knew the songs I liked and discovered 0 enjoyable deep cuts. But even at $15 a disc that would have been a $200 play through. And yes I'm aware of the high seas and the library. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago While true, I don't have to do any work at all right now to listen to as much music as I want and new music is available immediately. I also don't have to setup something to be able to stream music remotely so that I don't have to store all of it on my space limited device. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago I can stream more than 20cds worth from a catalog far more expansive than anything I could dream to store. It's simply worth the money for my usage. Moreover, I don't want to store anything locally, physically or otherwise. I'm ok with the risk of them pulling licensing, because after over a decade and a half of usage it's been an issue thats come up fewer than 5 times, and each time there was an alternative track/release available (i.e. part of a newer album or rerecorded). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago I don't disagree with you. But I have a lot of CDs already :) The rationale for me is that it's all available. I watched a Billy Joel documentary recently (I know 🙄) but it made do a listen through his discography. I'm glad I didn't buy those. It turns out I already knew the songs I liked and discovered 0 enjoyable deep cuts. But even at $15 a disc that would have been a $200 play through. And yes I'm aware of the high seas and the library. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago While true, I don't have to do any work at all right now to listen to as much music as I want and new music is available immediately. I also don't have to setup something to be able to stream music remotely so that I don't have to store all of it on my space limited device. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Now it's $30 but it's still like buying a cd a month. it's about twice as much as a mainstream cd at a brick-and-mortar or a random sampling of physical disc offerings at bandcamp. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago But I don't want random bandcamp samplings. I mean I like new music and go to a lot of Indy shows, but I want the ability to hear a song I like and then do a deep listen to the artist without committing to CDs or a trip to the library if it's available. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago But I don't want random bandcamp samplings. I mean I like new music and go to a lot of Indy shows, but I want the ability to hear a song I like and then do a deep listen to the artist without committing to CDs or a trip to the library if it's available. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zewm@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (3 children) I do. The benefits are worth it to me. It is my main source of video consumption. Ads removed on iOS without having to do work around is great. Not throttling me for using an ad blocker on desktop is also nice. Contributions to content creators I watch. Access to YouTube music which I use in my car. For me it’s worth. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] verifiedbyme@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) uBlock Lite is now available as an extension for Safari. I’m not sure what the Lite is about and saw other people complain about it, but for the past month Youtube on iOS has been a lovely experience for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zewm@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago That requires using YouTube through the browser. I use the YouTube app. It’s a different dynamic. permalink fedilink source parent [–] horse@feddit.org 1 point 1 month ago Check out "Unwatched for YouTube" on iOS. It's a bit janky, but it works. Certainly better than paying for premium. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] verifiedbyme@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) uBlock Lite is now available as an extension for Safari. I’m not sure what the Lite is about and saw other people complain about it, but for the past month Youtube on iOS has been a lovely experience for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zewm@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago That requires using YouTube through the browser. I use the YouTube app. It’s a different dynamic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zewm@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago That requires using YouTube through the browser. I use the YouTube app. It’s a different dynamic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] horse@feddit.org 1 point 1 month ago Check out "Unwatched for YouTube" on iOS. It's a bit janky, but it works. Certainly better than paying for premium. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] magnue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago If you're going to be paying for a music streaming service, you may as well go for YT premium as you get other things for barely any extra cost. Otherwise I don't see the value. I'm in the process of going local and replacing YT music though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] warm@kbin.earth 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) Lots. That's why the price is going up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago HAHA great point! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] _spiffy@piefed.ca 4 points 1 month ago I do. Years ago it was just google family stuff. I share it with my parents and wife and sisters. We have a decent library of shared movies(we don't buy those anymore) and we all use YouTube music. Ad free YouTube is a perk to it. If we cancel, we all lose it and I'm sure Google would not let us be a family scattered around the country. Splitting the cost makes it worthwhile, we watch a good amount of YouTube and we enjoy our kids can also watch stuff on the tv ad free. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] __hetz@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago I stopped paying however many years ago it was that they killed Play Music. YouTube Premium was just a benefit to a music service I felt was worth the money. Once they sucked all the humanity and soul out of Play Music and pushed YouTube Music on everyone, I bounced. Been using NewPipe on mobile, TubeArchivist and Jellyfin at home for videos I want to retain and watch on my TV or whatever. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stumu415@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) I rarely use YouTube. Maybe twice a year using a separate android app so no ads or other shit. So for me this total obsession with YT is beyond me. What on earth do you watch everyday? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] john117@piefed.jmsquared.net 3 points 1 month ago I pay 24 bucks a month for the family plan, as it's my most used platform. I get youtube music and no ads on YouTube, while sharing the benefits with 5 other family members. so, about 4 bucks I'm paying a month per person. I'm okay with the price permalink fedilink source parent
[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (4 children) Yes. I’m lazy and watch a lot of YouTube. I cannot deal with ads. That said, I have prime video through Amazon prime and it asks for, like, $4 per month to skip ads. I stopped watching prime video because of this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) And they wonder why torrents just won't go away... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago IPTV too. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) i just use ublock origin for youtube ads, they havnt done anything to stop the adblockers yet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago I don’t watch in browser mostly. Else I would do this too. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) And they wonder why torrents just won't go away... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago IPTV too. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) i just use ublock origin for youtube ads, they havnt done anything to stop the adblockers yet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago I don’t watch in browser mostly. Else I would do this too. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago I don’t watch in browser mostly. Else I would do this too. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children) I use YouTube Music, and get Premium with it. Other people pay for Spotify, and don't. Plus they also have to actually use Spotify instead, which is like a double negative. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) YT has made the non subscriber experience for music so bad I wouldn't consider it. Minimize the browser to check msgs and music stops, so dang annoying. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago this... it's a horrid experience without paying so why the hell would I ever pay.. that and I know the price goes up with features being removed. I'll continue to subscribe to nothing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) YT has made the non subscriber experience for music so bad I wouldn't consider it. Minimize the browser to check msgs and music stops, so dang annoying. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago this... it's a horrid experience without paying so why the hell would I ever pay.. that and I know the price goes up with features being removed. I'll continue to subscribe to nothing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago this... it's a horrid experience without paying so why the hell would I ever pay.. that and I know the price goes up with features being removed. I'll continue to subscribe to nothing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago I accept that if I block adverts in add supported content that's a problem. The creators get a cut of the money (way more than ads get them!) and accept most goes to Google because Youtube is hella expensive to run. ... if it gets ridiculously expensive then I will find somewhere else. I keep meaning to try Nebula.... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago apparently yes, so they dont see ADS. permalink fedilink source parent