▲ 518 ▼ Most Dangerous Jobs (thelemmy.club) submitted 2 days ago by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com [M] to c/flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 79 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] TheBloodFarts@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (1 child) Yes definitely equivalent, good call permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 child) Dunno about that, you're the ones equating loggers and fishermen to sex workers. 🫣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] smoker@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 child) They all have to work to survive. What would you say is the difference exactly? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (1 child) So does gang members. Whats your point? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] smoker@lemmy.zip 1 point 19 hours ago Huh? I’m asking you what your point is. You agree that they all have to work to survive, and are therefore working class. But, per your previous comment you're the ones equating loggers and fishermen to sex workers So clearly, you think there is some categorical difference between loggers and fishermen, and sex workers and gang members. I’m asking you what you think that difference is. If you insist that I make a point, and if all you’re going to say the difference is is that one category “breaks the law”, then I’d argue that there is another difference: gang members necessarily have to hurt other people, while sex workers, loggers, and fishermen do not. I’d also ask you to consider what conditions lead to the creation of each of these vocations to begin with. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 child) Dunno about that, you're the ones equating loggers and fishermen to sex workers. 🫣 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] smoker@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 child) They all have to work to survive. What would you say is the difference exactly? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (1 child) So does gang members. Whats your point? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] smoker@lemmy.zip 1 point 19 hours ago Huh? I’m asking you what your point is. You agree that they all have to work to survive, and are therefore working class. But, per your previous comment you're the ones equating loggers and fishermen to sex workers So clearly, you think there is some categorical difference between loggers and fishermen, and sex workers and gang members. I’m asking you what you think that difference is. If you insist that I make a point, and if all you’re going to say the difference is is that one category “breaks the law”, then I’d argue that there is another difference: gang members necessarily have to hurt other people, while sex workers, loggers, and fishermen do not. I’d also ask you to consider what conditions lead to the creation of each of these vocations to begin with. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] smoker@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 child) They all have to work to survive. What would you say is the difference exactly? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (1 child) So does gang members. Whats your point? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] smoker@lemmy.zip 1 point 19 hours ago Huh? I’m asking you what your point is. You agree that they all have to work to survive, and are therefore working class. But, per your previous comment you're the ones equating loggers and fishermen to sex workers So clearly, you think there is some categorical difference between loggers and fishermen, and sex workers and gang members. I’m asking you what you think that difference is. If you insist that I make a point, and if all you’re going to say the difference is is that one category “breaks the law”, then I’d argue that there is another difference: gang members necessarily have to hurt other people, while sex workers, loggers, and fishermen do not. I’d also ask you to consider what conditions lead to the creation of each of these vocations to begin with. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (1 child) So does gang members. Whats your point? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] smoker@lemmy.zip 1 point 19 hours ago Huh? I’m asking you what your point is. You agree that they all have to work to survive, and are therefore working class. But, per your previous comment you're the ones equating loggers and fishermen to sex workers So clearly, you think there is some categorical difference between loggers and fishermen, and sex workers and gang members. I’m asking you what you think that difference is. If you insist that I make a point, and if all you’re going to say the difference is is that one category “breaks the law”, then I’d argue that there is another difference: gang members necessarily have to hurt other people, while sex workers, loggers, and fishermen do not. I’d also ask you to consider what conditions lead to the creation of each of these vocations to begin with. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] smoker@lemmy.zip 1 point 19 hours ago Huh? I’m asking you what your point is. You agree that they all have to work to survive, and are therefore working class. But, per your previous comment you're the ones equating loggers and fishermen to sex workers So clearly, you think there is some categorical difference between loggers and fishermen, and sex workers and gang members. I’m asking you what you think that difference is. If you insist that I make a point, and if all you’re going to say the difference is is that one category “breaks the law”, then I’d argue that there is another difference: gang members necessarily have to hurt other people, while sex workers, loggers, and fishermen do not. I’d also ask you to consider what conditions lead to the creation of each of these vocations to begin with. permalink fedilink source parent