dandi8 comments on Don't paste the AI.

[–] dandi8@fedia.io 19 points 5 days ago (1 child)

Just like all those developers from the study who thought they were 19% faster but were, in fact, 10% slower?

parent

[+] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de -11 points 5 days ago* (3 children)

If that study is the only thing you have as an argument you won't get very far (though it is worth it to read the thoughts of some of the participants: https://domenic.me/metr-ai-productivity/).

It is very helpful to me as a developer: I can now write entire custom tools, one-off scripts and services for myself I otherwise wouldn't (because it would take too much time and too much effort), it catches a lot of logic bugs in code reviews as a first pass, it's good at generating unit-tests, etc, etc.

But coding is not all there is. To me as an immigrant, AI-based translation is a godsend. Same for writing scary-looking letters to government officials or applications for apartment viewings. Same for learning a language, actually. When I was looking for a new job - I used ChatGPT's automation to filter out crappy job postings and parse feedback on Glassdoor for the interesting ones. Like, genuinely, if we imagine for a moment that there's zero moral and environmental issues with AI and you still can't think of any possible applications of it for yourself you're either just not doing anything or you're dead.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 6 child comments

[–] webadict@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

If it is catching that many bugs, you are writing shit code or your review system blows. Likely both. The AI is about as likely to flag real bugs as it is to flag made up shit, but I still have to waste my fucking time verifying and proving the bot wrong. And you know what it didn't do? Save me time. Because I had to verify everything it said for no fucking reason.

And my fucking god, don't let it generate Tests. You get the worst Asserts imaginable. Goddamn. If you aren't writing your unit tests, then you won't know what you are testing.

Also, AI-based translation is hilariously awful. Like, let's assume for the sake of argument that the translation was technically correct (a thing that is not even mostly true), it will always underperform in terms of meaning because good translation conveys the spirit of the words and not the letter. AI translations don't know shit from Jack because they don't know anything, nor do they understand the context in which the words stand. And if you are having issues with translating and you're relying on AI to do so, then how the fuck would you even know it was working correctly?

Legitimately stupid.

But, sure, take out all the slave labor and environmentally devastating issues (a thing that only huge losers do because they are usually friendless assholes that think they're as cool as Elon Musk and are unintentionally right), and you are left with a machine that is sometimes right but still cognitively damaging.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] HieroProtagonist@feddit.org 1 point 4 days ago (1 child)

Also, AI-based translation is hilariously awful. Like, let’s assume for the sake of argument that the translation was technically correct (a thing that is not even mostly true), it will always underperform in terms of meaning because good translation conveys the spirit of the words and not the letter. AI translations don’t know shit from Jack because they don’t know anything, nor do they understand the context in which the words stand. And if you are having issues with translating and you’re relying on AI to do so, then how the fuck would you even know it was working correctly?

Honest question: You have not tried DeepL, right?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] webadict@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago

I have seen every ML/LLM translation be shit, so if you want to point to a less shitty version, whatever. It will not matter to me because every AI translation given to me was god fucking awful versus even a shitty human translation because humans, in their flawed yet understandable ways, do not translate things in arbitrary ways, nor do they make the same types of mistakes that an AI does. Humans understand how humans think, and the process of writing a sentence vs a paragraph vs a chapter vs a book are just... Different? But an AI just won't understand those differences. Not to any noticeable effect. Nor do they understand nuances in writing and dialog. They just write or do a sarcasm thing, and that's the entirety of their repertoire. That's all they "know".

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 child)

A lot of bold "I am smart you are stupid arararara" statements rooted in pure anger and angst rather than trying to have a conversation. Though I never expected less from lemmings, I knew where I was posting ;^)

I don't need to prove the validity of my experience to you or convince you of anything, but I'm happy to talk. If you are going to immediately resort to personal attacks then your ""arguments"" are not worth replying to, I'm not about to have a shout match with you, I'd rather go do something more interesting. Tho feel free to continue shouting into the void if it makes it easier for you, I guess?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] webadict@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago

Is it personally attacking you to point out that it is a monstrous thing to use AI while it is pretty actively killing the planet or that it is using stolen labor to work and refuses to recompense said labor? Because to me, that's just kinda how it is, and if you can't see the issues in that, it does sort of imply someone failed you at some point.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child)

Do you really think there's only one study that shows that AI increases feelings of productivity, while also slowing down productivity?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I think the question of speed is entirely tangential to what's being discussed here, to the point of being inconsequential. We were discussing whether AI makes everyone's life worse. My point is that I can do stuff now that I could not before, and that makes my life better. It's a very useful tool for me. It also doesn't matter to me whether it makes me faster or slower at stuff I already could do before (but if it makes the experience more pleasant - sure, why not).

It's fine (though a bit unhealthy) if lemmings want to bury their head in the sand, pat each other on the back and try to convince each other that nobody can ever possibly find the evil machine useful, and those who claim they do are just lying idiot AI-bros, but if even my non-technical parents use it - you've already lost the war, sorry.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent