you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

How about requiring Apple to provide an option for the device "owner" to disable Apple's "protections"? If I want to choose freedom over "security", I should have the option to do so. But the EU seems more interested in app signatures and app distribution through centralized channels controlled by the very same monopolists (as a similar approach can be observed on Android). But everything to protect the children, right?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (1 child)

    If I want to choose freedom over "security", I should have the option to do so.

    You can, but it's a careful sequence of steps.

    1. Discard, replace, and forever avoid anything apple. You controlling your device is really not their deal.
    2. Graphene on ... something
    3. This step intentionally left blank
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    Yeah, I understand (as an ex-GOS and current pmOS user). It just feels hypocritical to crutch on monopolies for "child protection", while in the same breath criticizing monopolistic practices... The EU should pick their poison

  • source
  • parent