you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (27 children)

The red truck is passing, at 1km/h speed difference you shouldn't be waiting more than 30 seconds for it to clear. Patience.

Every one replying to me that it's technically three truck lengths needs to calm down. If you hate driving this much then there's better things to do with that energy. It's terrifying that I'm sharing the highway with some of y'all.

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    for a truck to pass another truck, it has to be in the left lane for at least 3 truck-lengths, which is roughly 65 meters. 1kph is 10m/36s, so 65m is 36s×6.5 = 3.9minutes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Tell that to the truck driver. 1 km/hr faster equates to just 36 seconds saved on a 100 km trip. And to do that they cause a massive traffic jam that greatly increases the chance of accidents and delays dozens of people for several minutes each.

    Why are you OK haughtily telling dozens of drivers "patience," while ignoring the massive asocial asshole causing a huge disruption from an even greater level of impatience?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Because I have witnessed car accidents with fatalities. Yes, the trucker is an asshole. Have patience. Get home safe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Think of where you are right now. You are not the passenger of a vehicle telling a driver to have patience. We're specifically discussing the situation from an outside perspective. "Have patience" is useful advice for someone actively driving a car stuck behind passing trucks. It comes across as condescending when you bring it into a discussion about whether passing truck drivers are in the wrong or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    You're poo-pooing the impatience of the car drivers but ignoring the impatience of the truck driver.

    Why the hell is the truck passing another truck to begin with? You're talking a measly 1 km/hr difference! For a trip of 100 km, that measly 1 km/hr difference means the truck driver is passing another truck to save a measly 36 seconds. (And that's the ideal case, assuming the speed difference is maintained the whole time.) And by doing so they create a massive traffic jam that causes dozens of drivers to be delayed by minutes.

    There's a reason many states ban trucks from passing other trucks. It's an extremely selfish and asshole thing to do. One truck driver saves 30 seconds or so on their trip. In exchange, dozens of drivers lose minutes. The truck driver is stealing an hour of time from the rest of society to give himself 30 seconds. You should not be defending such selfish bastards.

    The math changes a bit if you assume a longer trip, but the conclusion won't. Inevitably the time the truck driver steals from others will be vastly more than the time they save. It's dangerous asocial behavior.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    You don't know why one truck decided to pass another one. Could be a safety issue. There's no way for you to know for sure. It's OK though, you'll still get to your destination within a minute of when you would have if they hadn't chosen to overtake. And everything will be fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    You're grasping at straws. What safety issue would cause one truck to need to pass another? If you're worried about something falling off the truck in front of you, the correct response is to slow down and increase your following distance, not to slowly pass the other truck while creating a massive traffic hazard.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    If it's a "safety issue," it's definitely not happening at a 1 MPH speed differential. C'mon, now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Exactly. If I'm driving a truck and I'm worried the truck in front of me is about to explode or have a part fly off it, I'm not going to pass them at 1 mph. If I can pass faster, I'll pass quickly. If I can't, I'll hit the brakes and put a huge amount of distance between us. In a safety emergency, you want to increase your separation as fast as possible. You do that by braking, not by slowly passing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago*

    You forget the other vehicle is also moving and is really long, it takes almost 3 minutes for one to pass the other and a distance of over 2000m. And just bumper to bumper, that doesn’t include safe lane changing distances either.

    If you’re talking two cars, than yes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Yeah but the red truck isnt letting me burn up all my gas. Its also making me wear out my break pads because i need to stay exactly 6 feet behind it until it finally moves over. At least I get a free lunch of rocks that my cars windshield gets to eat as I sit behind it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Insufferable nerd shit. The truck driver can fuck off are pass when appropriate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (6 children)

    People getting so bent out of shape seeing two trucks next to each other that they can't even type straight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    You just have an axe to grind against cars in general. You're not objective enough to have a useful opinion here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    I own two cars that I like very much. They are not necessary for my opinion to be useful. Ad hominem is for babies. Are you a baby?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Your opinions clearly indicate you have axe to grind against private vehicle ownership. Fair enough. But that is clouding your opinions. Half your posts are from the "Fuck Cars" community. You're looking for any thin, ridiculous, and rare excuse to justify the truck driver creating a massive road hazard endangering dozens of innocent people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment