237
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] son_of_darkness@lemmy.world 87 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Even Linus is conflating "doing more" with "being more productive". A car factory could, if they wanted, pump 10x more cars out the door. But qualiry would decrease these would be full of defects, so in the end you weren't more productive

I don't care if there's more PRs. It's just and illusion of productivity

[-] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

Even Linus is conflating “doing more” with “being more productive”.

No he isn't:

Torvalds’ broader argument is that generating code has become easy, while maintaining a system over years or decades remains hard — and AI does not close that gap on its own. Without a working understanding of the underlying architecture, he suggested, AI assistance can help someone make mistakes faster rather than build something durable.

[-] mandolrain@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago

Productivity = Doing more things Efficiency = Doing the right things

I wrote a whole thesis on the subject AMA

[-] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Wouldnt productivity have two knobs? Efficiency and energy/effort input?

Also efficiency sometimes goes against "right"? If you need resiliancy you then "right" migh include redundancy. In software, that could also be guardrails like memory safety that necissarily take some extra abstraction to implement and a processing penalty?

[-] Gonzako@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Where can I read your thesis?

[-] mandolrain@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Haha its "out there" but that would also mean that I need to out myself.. Let me have a think on this one. Its also in Swedish but mb not a problem(?)

[-] Natanael@infosec.pub 3 points 1 day ago

Efficiency is a bit more about also not doing the wrong things :)

Har du en länk kanske?

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Depends on what your metric for "productive" is. If you're producing more cars that have to all be recalled and fixed, you're not making more money than you would had you made higher quality cars from the start, and you then also lose face and your brand is viewed as inferior, so sales drop, and the spiral goes brr.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago

That doesn't matter as long as it doesn't happen in this quarter.

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

too fuckin' true

[-] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I understand what you're trying to say, and even agree with it, but the car factory example is just wrong. Those have a design speed that is generally limited by cycle times for individual steps. Like a robot has to place say 10 spot welds. You can't speed that up. To stick with this example: in theory you could add a robot so both place 5 spots, but that rework takes probably a year and costs millions. Plus you don't have one bottleneck like this, but a lot of them with similar speed (hence the "design speed" of the whole factory).

You can slow the whole factory down to run under capacity (or not run it during night shift), and then you have room to speed it up. But if you're running at capacity, there is very little you can do.

It's physically impossible to speed up the factory to 1.5x, let alone 10x.

[-] son_of_darkness@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Most of these robots are purposely slowed down for human safety and other factors. So I do believe you can speed up a factory a lot, perhaps not10x, but still.

[-] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago

No they aren't slowed down for "human factors" or safety. They are in cages or behind barricades (at least in Europe). If you open them (like a door or cross a laser barrier), the whole line or at least the cell cell just stops and all of the red lights come on. You can believe what you want, but you can't speed anything up significantly without massive investment or work. Or they would be running faster, cause money.

Source: I work in the industry and have been in running car plants.

[-] Flower@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

You can just skip a few welds, don't measure lubricant exactly but do it quickly ±20%, or don't bother smoothly apply sealant. Reduce time to let paint dry. Don't bother with exact alignment. Sure, the car might rattle, rust, break in a small accident and the engine doesn't last long but you're cranking them out fast.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
237 points (89.1% liked)

Technology

87315 readers
3445 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS