you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)

Okay.

I don’t agree. But let’s say I agree.

…Just don’t use Claude?

Use an LLM without a watermark; there are hundreds to pick from.


In other words, if one is going to try to hide automated writing, I think there should be a bare minimum effort to do so. That includes:

  • Reading/checking the text, to see if it makes any sense.

  • Actually trying to pass it as human.

90% of slop is brain melting slop because this minimum bar isn’t even met. And all Claude’s watermark would do is catch that bottom of the barrel; it wouldn’t censor anyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    From what I understood you need statistical tests to detect the watermark. You cannot easily detect by eyeballing that a coin will land on heads 55% of the time instead of 50%

  • source
  • parent