you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
31 points (100.0% liked)
GenZedong
5263 readers
29 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
He's full of it, cause I read The Martian and it definitely has a line at/near the end that is promoting working together toward a common good (which the movie leaves out and exchanges for a bootstraps individualist line). With how aware of ideology I am these days, it was very obvious to me when I read the book vs. watching the movie, what they were doing, replacing even a mildly collectivist message with an individualist one.
I could easily believe Weir wasn't consciously writing it out that way in the book, but it doesn't change the fact that works of fiction have ideological messaging in them either way. You can't avoid it by pretending you're "just an entertainer". You'll still insert bits of stuff you picked up from others, and bits of stuff you believe in, into what you write.
People who say this stuff about "preachy works vs. works without commentary" are some of the more oblivious to propaganda (or they are lying). Preachy works aren't more ideological; they are less covert about what ideology they are promoting and are sometimes more pointed in promoting it than unconsciously written works. That's the difference. But Andy Weir is a Yankee white dude, so it's easy for him to think that the dominant ideology is "common sense" rather than ideology, since it benefits him.