392
AI agents aren’t legally responsible for any harm that they cause, experts say. So who is? (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
122 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

Was supposed to say illegal, the argument didnt work with saying legal.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Ok, but if time and time again, it proves that this does more harm than good, much like firearms, shouldn't the person/company that made it be held to account as well as the operator? I'm not saying that it IS the case, but it should be.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent