this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026

392 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

technology@lemmy.world

87,929 readers

15,933 active

4,060 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

moderators

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

AI agents aren’t legally responsible for any harm that they cause, experts say. So who is? (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world

122 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Darkonion@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

If someone sells you a knife that routinely fires bullets, then the company may have some complicity as with any misrepresented product.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] LilBobbyTables@lemmy.today 2 points 3 weeks ago

But in that analogy, the knife routinely asks you to confirm if you want to fire bullets or not.

AI does nothing without people telling it what to do, and giving it permission to do it.

parent