Raising compulsory super could do the same job as raising interest rates — but the money is yours. So why aren't we talking about it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

inflation is not currently being driven by discretionary spending

Tom Lay, ABS head of business statistics, said: “The 0.8 per cent rise in June was driven by discretionary spending rising for the second month in a row at 1.2 per cent, thanks to continued strength in Transport and Recreation and culture.”

https://www.abs.gov.au/media-centre/media-releases/household-spending-08-june

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    That's the Household Spending Index, which is a small portion of inflation.

    "Inflation" conventionally refers to the Consumer Price Index

    The largest contributors to annual inflation were Housing (+6.8%), Food and non-alcoholic beverages (+3.3%) and Recreation and culture (+3.3%).

    Only one of those categories is considered discretionary. Note that the CPI infamously excludes mortgages.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    Yeah, you said inflation not driven by discretionary when it clearly has a role to play

    https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/economy/price-indexes-and-inflation/consumer-price-index-australia/jun-2026#analytical-series

    Following the Middle East conflict, non-discretionary inflation has spiked up to the 5%, driven by increases in automotive fuel prices

    I mean if one switches to an EV for example that counts as a discretionary purchase but that then lowers the demand of non-discretionary fuel prices

    I think I hate this discussion

  • source
  • parent