▲ 271 ▼ "Code was never the hard part" is an insult to all programmers (blog.senko.net) submitted 2 months ago by FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world 71 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/54810980
[+] xeno_the_warrior_prince@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) I mean, a key element of the anti-AI movement is that AI "steals" art, but I fundamentally believe in that art (and ideas) can't be owned and therefore can't be stolen. Ditto for code or what have you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 1 point 2 months ago They CAN be owned. Particularly art. And I say this even when I'm anti-copyright and pro-copyleft, but even then I don't want to lose my means of work and subsistence and my moral rights. Also, much of that gets even worse when AI gets trained with works that you didn't even published yet, but that a hidden background AI process scraped in the platform you used to backup, plan or talk about that works. I'm talking out of experience. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) I mean, a key element of the anti-AI movement is that AI "steals" art, but I fundamentally believe in that art (and ideas) can't be owned and therefore can't be stolen. Ditto for code or what have you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 1 point 2 months ago They CAN be owned. Particularly art. And I say this even when I'm anti-copyright and pro-copyleft, but even then I don't want to lose my means of work and subsistence and my moral rights. Also, much of that gets even worse when AI gets trained with works that you didn't even published yet, but that a hidden background AI process scraped in the platform you used to backup, plan or talk about that works. I'm talking out of experience. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 1 point 2 months ago They CAN be owned. Particularly art. And I say this even when I'm anti-copyright and pro-copyleft, but even then I don't want to lose my means of work and subsistence and my moral rights. Also, much of that gets even worse when AI gets trained with works that you didn't even published yet, but that a hidden background AI process scraped in the platform you used to backup, plan or talk about that works. I'm talking out of experience. permalink fedilink source parent