68
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
68 points (95.9% liked)
movies
3774 readers
607 users here now
A community about movies and cinema.
Related communities:
- !television@piefed.social
- !homevideo@feddit.uk
- !mediareviews@lemmy.world
- !casualconversation@piefed.social
Rules
- Be civil
- No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
- Do not spam
- Stay on topic
- These rules will evolve as this community grows
No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Sure they do. Seeing 2 people nude up and simulate motion isn't texture, it's carnal gratification no different than porn. You can dress it up as art or meaning or whatever that makes you ignore the fact that you want to see sex.
You know how I know I'm right? Where are the sex scenes with ugly and fat people in them?
It absolutely can be texture. Have you seen a History of Violence? The film has two sex scenes, and they're crucial to the tone of the film, the characterization of the protagonist, and the narrative tension of a marriage in crisis. Would the film work without those scenes? Maybe, but it's a much tougher sell to understand Viggo Mortensen's character and emotional journey without them.
As for fat and ugly people not having sex scenes, that's a selection bias. Most celebrities are not fat or ugly. The few celebrities that are may also be self conscious and unwilling to do such scenes. But they definitely happen. Off the top of my head, Kathy Bates and Woody Harrelson have both done sex scenes despite not being conventionally attractive.
There are plenty of things that are just in movies for the spectacle and excitement. Explosions, car chases. Surely we shouldn't ban all of them.
Like, I get where people who don't want to see sex scenes are coming from, but this is a movie literally about sex. There are plenty of Disney movies you can watch, let me have some sexiness here!