you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 week ago (1 child)

Just look at this graph from the report you’re citing.

I prefer this one ;)

https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2026/technology-solar-pv-and-wind#abstract

and this one:

https://explore.openelectricity.org.au/energy/nem/?range=all&interval=1M&view=discrete-time&group=Detailed&hide=battery_charging%2Cpumps%2Ccoal_brown%2Ccoal_black%2Cbioenergy_biomass%2Cdistillate%2Cgas_steam%2Cgas_ccgt%2Cgas_ocgt%2Cgas_recip%2Cgas_wcmg%2Chydro%2Cwind%2Csolar_utility%2Csolar_rooftop

and this one:

Analysis: Wind and solar power overtake fossil fuels in Germany for first time ever

https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-wind-and-solar-power-overtake-fossil-fuels-in-germany-for-first-time-ever

etcetc

A lie that will cost millions of lives

Eh 60-75 million people died in ww2 and that was entirely man made problem, I'm just thankful renewables are somewhat economically competitive at all otherwise that co2 graph you pointed out earlier would be a straight line going vertical

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    That's called cherrypicking. The importance of statistics is not linked to the good feelings they provide. Germany and Australia could be net-zero today, that wouldn't change the global problem at all. The worldwide statistics are enough, and they're horrible. A little better, but still very much horrible.

    I'm just thankful renewables are somewhat economically competitive at all otherwise that co2 graph you pointed out earlier would be a straight line going vertical

    That won't make a big difference. It's not much better than a straight line… and it's without taking into account the other kinds of pollution, as dangerous as CO2, the deforestation, the free fall of biodiversity, the “tipping points” we're trespassing (and that we may wouldn't have trespassed without the industrial lie about “green energy”).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    That’s called cherrypicking

    Funny that's what I thought you were doing after I pointed out how you can't seem to grasp a trend

    That won’t make a big difference

    You think a flat line that is turning around to go negative is no different to a line going straight vertical up?

    What?

    I'm out, thanks for the discussion!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 week ago* (1 child)