48
The return of supersonic flight hinges on the race to solve one big hurdle | CNN (www.cnn.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The skies of Oklahoma City roared for six months in 1964 as military aircraft intentionally rattled the population below with a daily barrage of thunderous sonic booms. It was a controversial test — the consequences of which have lingered to this day.

Two approaches in the works could revolutionize air travel by making future supersonic passenger planes compliant with the FAA’s new noise rules: Colorado-based company Boom Supersonic, which is specifically mentioned in the FAA proposal, plans to use physics to prevent sonic booms from ever reaching the ground, regardless of plane design. NASA, on the other hand, is flying an experimental plane called X-59 that is specifically designed to reduce the intensity of the boom.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

but I'd guess that some of the technologies that make SS travel possible may make subsonic travel more efficient.

I wouldn't count on that. if a plane is optimized for efficiency during the longest part of its flight, which would presumably be supersonic cruise at high altitude, a bunch of things that make modern airliners as efficient as they are (blended winglets, and turbofan engines where the fan generates more thrust than the actual turbine engine exhaust) are directly counter to that

It's an entirely different kind of flying. All together!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •