you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 2 months ago (15 children)

Self-hosted LLMs are neat and private, if you (already) have the hardware/budget and some cheap (solar PV) surplus juice to drive it.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Do you know anyone doing all of that? Running a local model on off-grid power?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    Someone mentioned that, but it doesn't have to be off-grid. My 2 kWp system is grid-tied and if I would start running a local LLM it would be an incentive to add another couple.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    It may sound odd but I’ve heard people bring up the above point a few times. “AI isn’t bad - if you run it on a sustainable off-grid system it’s perfectly fine.”

    But I have NOT encountered people actually doing this even once, let alone a few times. That’s why I was asking.

    Anything that wastes energy can be recast as harmless if you put it on an imaginary sustainable setup but that just seems like fantasizing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Renewable infra isn't sustainable, since it can't be built with renewable energy alone. As such it's just a fossil multiplier. I make about 2/3rd of my own net power, since my electricity meter is old enough to run backwards. I can't install more orelse my meter would read negative. I intend to run a Qwen model that fits my 8 GB HBM Radeon card as an experiment during the day, starting end of this month.

    If this works I consider running something hotter, and double my PV capacity. Adding AC or an EV would be another option. None of this is sustainable, but not exactly a fantasy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (7 children)

    oh so yours is trained on ethical sources? you compensated the creators for their work and did so with their consent to machine training?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

    What the fuck are ethical sources? Where is compensation and consent when I unapologetically use pirate archives of books and papers? You people crack me up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (5 children)

    the fact that you have no idea what I'm talking about either means you're full of shit, or cartoonishly stupid and evil.

    Probably both

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

    The fact that you immediately descend into ad hominems indicates that you're a just another troll that should be posting from hexbear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    you're simply used to llm sycophancy, not talking to actual people.

    you really not understanding training on sources compensated for their content is hilariously stupid

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    You're not understanding what standing on the shoulders of giants means. Locally hosted open weights models are free/libre and puts you in control of your data. Since we're talking about hilariously stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments