you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I was thinking that with legal backing, blockchain could be a good record of ownership for deeds. Like NFTs but for physical property.

The history of ownership and the public visibility are good features there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    Yeah who doesn't want a ledger you cannot change, sounds like a good idea. /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    In the case of deeds, i think it is desirable because it gives you an immutable history of ownership.

    There are other problems but i don't believe that is one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    But with good legal backing, all you need is a shared database and maybe basic cryptographic signatures to prove ownership in case of malicious actors. So basically, traditional banking.

  • source
  • parent