you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -7 points 1 month ago* (18 children)

It's worth noting that in the 1990's while the rest of easter EUR, particularly PO, RO, and CZ tweaked their economies and societies in whatever way was necessary at the time in order to get their asses into NATO and the EU, Ukraine spent 30 years dawdling, unsure if they wanted to face east or west. Shame on them for that. They created their own monster by being irresolute, unlike the Poles and Romanians who also HATE Russia, know history, in some respects share a common history with all of eastern EUR, and see very clearly. A fair amount of UKR's indecision was due to Russian meddling in politics there, but by the time UKR woke the fuck up about Russia's nature and intentions it was almost too late. That timeline takes us to the year 2022, approximately. UKR is still corrupt as fuck, nobody knows who can be trusted and they are putting tremendous effort into reforming their legal system, politics and military structures to conform with EU/NATO norms. If they had been this decided (instead of divided) back in 2014, they'd have been in the EU AND NATO by now. They are paying the price for their dawdling and indecision, fuelled mainly by post-soviet corruption mentality which they are rueing and repenting of almost too late..

I say this as someone who actually supports Ukraine. But I am not blind to their faults, either.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    Ukrainians decided to stay in the Soviet Union. That's rejected and thrown out and the nation dissolved by one drunken imbecile. Ukrainians decided to leave the Russian Federation. That's fine, it seems. Ukrainians choose a government that doesn't choose Europe. They're overthrown in a U.S. backed fascist coup. Eastern Ukrainians democratically choose to secede. That's rejected by the West and the coup government. What's left of Ukraine chooses a peace candidate. He has no control and the Nazi's just keep fighting. Now Ukrainians can't vote at all.

    Ukrainians faults are in our stars and stripes. America did this. America always does it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

    So you're saying in soviet union a single person could force the entirety of its people against their will? Were you ever outside of america?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

    They voted and that Pizza Hut loving drunk threw it out. Not democracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

    When was there democracy in Soviet Union?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Don't take this the wrong way but as someone who has lived and worked in many of the countries you mentioned - you're full of s**t and your hyper-simplified version of history is as cute as it is cartoonish.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    well maybe you can enlighten us all with some of your insights if you know so much about these things.

    that's a lot more work than calling people names. you down?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago*

    Your generalizations and reductionism is so over the top and absurd, I wouldn't even know where to begin or what the point would be. It's not hard to tell that you're just regurgitating bits and pieces and are not actually familiar with the history (not to mention the historiography) of that part of the world. The tale of Ukraine (and the former Soviet bloc more generally) after 1990 is not a simple one to tell, contrary to what you think and wrote here.

    I'm not here to educate you - you need to learn to do that yourself. All I am saying is that you're wrong and need to research the issue much further in order to gain a good understanding of the topic you're trying to engage in.

    Am I wrong in my assessment? Well, there's only one reasonable way to find out. Good luck!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    Bruh Ukraine is no more corrupt than Romania/Hungary/Bulgaria. Even during the war civil society was able to defend anticorruption institutions.

    The decision not to take Ukraine into EU/NATO is purely based on politics - specifically being afraid of russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    there was a 20 year window where RU was to weak to threaten anybody with any thing. That would have been the time, if UKR had seen the opportunity like the Poles, Czechs, Slovaks, and Romanians did. A costly mistake.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    This is why y'all hate Putin. Russia is no longer weak.

    They have more natural resources than any other nation in the world, especially per capita. That's all you need to know about the West's aggression toward them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Strong is relative. We'll see how strong Russia is after they are defeated by Ukraine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    It's relative to what I was talking about, natural resources, not GDP. And I even said it was more so per capital, BECAUSE it's not as populous.

    Not only is Ukraine not winning, it's not such a flex when backed by the world's richest governments.

    Ukraine is no different than Israel in this matter, another fascist ethnostate proxy for Western imperialism.

    Ukrainians can't even vote. The men can't even leave to escape this Nazi death cult.

    Fuck "Ukraine".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Well they had the downside of the russian army being at their borders and a massive russian speaking minority ...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    this is also true. but they also lacked direction and a national sense of self.. right up until the last minute when Russia was about to swallow them and the jaws were closing. If they had that sense 10 or 20 years earlier they'de be in a different situation. Russia's actions are Russian/Commie imperialism 101.. take an ethnically or politically divided state and invade it. slowly. Maybe UKR will be better as a divided state. For some bizarre reason, the further south and east you go in EUR the more the Slavs in those regions love their mono-ethnic states, for some reason. Even to the degree of cutting off their noses to spite their faces. Something fundamentally warped about the Slavic mind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    The palestinians also did not have a national sense of self untill they were occupied for the better half of a century ... The german national identity needed Napoleon to really take of (and many more work Like that )

    And 'mono ethnic states' was bog standart for emerging nationalnstates - it just took some.places longer to create a national state and the according nationalism - hardly anything specific about 'the slavic mind'

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • What about "Palestinians" "occupied" "under the Turks" for 1200 years during the Ottoman Empire. The Era that immediately pre-dates the 20th century. No national consciousness to speak of for centuries when ruled by non-arab Turks who still consider Arabs to be lesser than Turks. Add a few non-muslim European-ish Jews to the land and suddenly Palis have a national consciousness where they never had one before? It seems to be forgotten that BOTH sides- Israeli AND Palestinians walked away from the UN plan in 1948. I guess they wanted to settle it themselves, out in the streets. Well, now after 80 years we see who is winning. It's not fair to cry foul now. Both sides gave up that option back in 1948.

  • source
  • parent