▲ 14 ▼ OpenAI Says Astra Solved 10 Open Math Problems With Lean Proofs: The proof files are public, but the new model is still private. (www.implicator.ai) submitted 1 month ago by eicker@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (2 children) In other words its all marketing bullshit. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child) So youre suggesting they secretly have Einstein standing in the server rack, making loud fan noises with his mouth and just typing really fast? Either the problems were solved or they weren't. If they were, then that's evidence enough; doesn't matter if they model isn't publicly available. Having those sudden breakthroughs come from a person or even a large group of mathematicians, suddenly and all at once, would be more surprising than a well-harnessed LLM figuring it out. With that said, I'm curious about peer review of the actual proofs. Just because Lean builds them doesn't mean they're materially valid. It could very well be that it's completely wrong and it just hallucinated well enough to fool OpenAI into publishing it, which would be a hilarious egg-on-face moment permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iconic_admin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago I agree with you. If it solved it, it solved it. The title is an odd phrasing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 1 point 4 weeks ago A few of the erdos problems have been independently verified. It's legit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child) So youre suggesting they secretly have Einstein standing in the server rack, making loud fan noises with his mouth and just typing really fast? Either the problems were solved or they weren't. If they were, then that's evidence enough; doesn't matter if they model isn't publicly available. Having those sudden breakthroughs come from a person or even a large group of mathematicians, suddenly and all at once, would be more surprising than a well-harnessed LLM figuring it out. With that said, I'm curious about peer review of the actual proofs. Just because Lean builds them doesn't mean they're materially valid. It could very well be that it's completely wrong and it just hallucinated well enough to fool OpenAI into publishing it, which would be a hilarious egg-on-face moment permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iconic_admin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago I agree with you. If it solved it, it solved it. The title is an odd phrasing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iconic_admin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago I agree with you. If it solved it, it solved it. The title is an odd phrasing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 1 point 4 weeks ago A few of the erdos problems have been independently verified. It's legit. permalink fedilink source parent