119

cross-posted from: https://piefed.ca/c/games@lemmy.world/p/869515/game-pass-was-supposed-to-save-xbox-instead-its-killing-the-company

"Netflix for games" has proven to be far from the ideal solution.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm actually really surprised this didn't work. They had acquired such a large amount of quality studios, IPs and a huge back catalogue. They had enough money to keep the subscription low indefinitely. Getting added to the Game Pass was a huge deal for indie devs at one point, but I think those who did were disapointed with returns.

Granted the article says they dropped 300 million on Jedi Survivor and Suicide Squad... which gets to the point of how unsustainable subscription models are. It's like a smaller version of the Ai market. Just like how you can't break even on 300 million selling a $10 a month subscription, you can't break even on $30 billion investments with the same $10 subscription.

Still, how could you possibly mess this up. lol

[-] Toga77@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Welp, one way to screw up is to buy shitloads of studios, then do absolutely nothing with them.

It is utter insanity that they have owned Bethesda this long, released two seasons of Fallout on TV, and have given fans NOTHING on the game front.

Fallout 76 does not count for 95% of the fan base.

Microsoft and Xbox have been more stupid that just about any company I can think of.

[-] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Starfield was so unimpactful this guy forgot it even existed.

[-] Toga77@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That starfield was the only project Bethesda had going at all is absolute corporate malpractice

[-] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago

It was great when I first got it, but I ended but getting fatigued with it. New releases wanted time investment, but the rising costs meant I felt I should play more stuff. In the end everything I wanted to play required time and I felt that I was no longer getting value out of it. It would have cost less to not have it and just buy the game for some titles.

[-] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I think that's how it went down for most people.

I remember getting free games with Gold back on the 360 and One. Eventually they became unplayable without the subscription. Kinda enshitified.

There's just something about your progression being tied to a subscription that makes you want to invest less in the game.

this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
119 points (95.4% liked)

Technology

86757 readers
2816 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS