(…) Apple Intelligence was both the worst and best thing to happen to Apple as far as the AI bubble goes.

It was a mass-radicalization of its users against AI – an attempt to cram a barely-functional series of add-ons that nobody asked for in the most-obtrusive way possible, with summaries that were almost immediately turned into memes and a new Siri that was, somehow, even worse than the old Siri.

And I think that told Apple to pump the brakes. It's barely spent anything on capex. It's barely done anything with AI. Despite headline after headline claiming it's "falling behind," nobody can really explain what it is it's falling behind on or why it matters. People hate Apple Intelligence, and I think Apple knows that, and so they're going to jingle the keys for the markets by putting "AI" on stuff without ever really putting their back into it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Your consent is still required, but Apple is making promises about anonymity and privacy they simply can't guarantee when sending data to a 3rd party server.

Apple is using its years of marketing as a privacy forward company just to put one of the worst technologies for privacy a tap away from uninformed users. (E.g. my parents who will tap 'OK' on every popup thrown at them.) After years of headlines of how dangerous consulting LLMs for health concerns can get, Apple launches ChatGPT integration in Apple Health.

Additionally Apple has made promises to be carbon neutral by 2030, impossible if we start to measure the true cost of Apple Intelligence. Unless of course we just blame that on Google or OpenAI. You know, like Foxcon was responsible for the suicide nets and horrendous conditions in the iPhone factories.

For more than a decade Apple has trained its employees on supplier responsibilities, ethical code of conduct and marketed their privacy and environmental causes. None of these values are compatible with OpenAI or Google, who are now running Siri and Apple Intelligence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I get your concern and I feel the same way. However, you’ve used concerns as fact when even the link you’ve provided counteracts your argument.

    Guess I’ll wait to see if Apple’s promises match their previous ones they fulfilled when they used ChatGPT for AI. I’ve still found no evidence to the contrary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    I agree my initial comment was oversimplified, but what you say is not fact but only concern contradicts Apple's own statements about what data they share with 3rd parties under the Apple Intelligence product.

    If putting "OpenAI must process your information solely for the purpose of fulfilling your request and not store your information or any responses it provides unless required under applicable laws. OpenAI also must not use your information to improve or train its models." on their website is enough of a guarantee for you that OpenAI won't do what they please, then good luck.

  • source
  • parent