▲ 558 ▼ Pope's official prayer app commits cardinal sin, leaks 700K+ users' info (www.theregister.com) submitted 1 month ago by stermy4u@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 70 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (3 children) It sill works, you get first name and last name. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago (2 children) Maybe I should remove that from my comment lol, I feel like I'm contributing to a data breach or something permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) It is in the article doesn't matter if you remove it. The moment the article became public it is already too late. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 1 point 1 month ago I know, but a lot of people don't click the article, they just look at headline + comments, so it's still a reduction of visibility or an extra step. My comment is like exposing the endpoint right there front and centre. Plus, I don't like being personally responsible for any data breach. Maybe it's just a tiny thing but it felt like the right thing to do permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago (2 children) Maybe I should remove that from my comment lol, I feel like I'm contributing to a data breach or something permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) It is in the article doesn't matter if you remove it. The moment the article became public it is already too late. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 1 point 1 month ago I know, but a lot of people don't click the article, they just look at headline + comments, so it's still a reduction of visibility or an extra step. My comment is like exposing the endpoint right there front and centre. Plus, I don't like being personally responsible for any data breach. Maybe it's just a tiny thing but it felt like the right thing to do permalink fedilink source parent
[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) It is in the article doesn't matter if you remove it. The moment the article became public it is already too late. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 1 point 1 month ago I know, but a lot of people don't click the article, they just look at headline + comments, so it's still a reduction of visibility or an extra step. My comment is like exposing the endpoint right there front and centre. Plus, I don't like being personally responsible for any data breach. Maybe it's just a tiny thing but it felt like the right thing to do permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 1 point 1 month ago I know, but a lot of people don't click the article, they just look at headline + comments, so it's still a reduction of visibility or an extra step. My comment is like exposing the endpoint right there front and centre. Plus, I don't like being personally responsible for any data breach. Maybe it's just a tiny thing but it felt like the right thing to do permalink fedilink source parent