you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 33 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Sometimes I think I'm the only linux user who doesn't care about their terminal emulator. I use whatever came installed. I assume it's bash? I don't know, but anything i want to do is supported by all of them.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Akchually, those are shells, not terminal emulators.

    Which I guess confirms that you really don't care. Whatever works for you, works for you :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    What's the difference.

    How does the virtual terminal factor in.

    Why are some shells not login shells

    What is a terminal these days and why does it mess up keypresses

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    A terminal emulator (such as xterm, tmux, or emacs) is responsible for displaying a pseudoterminal in a different context (such as an x server, another terminal, or an emacs buffer respectively). Terminals are divided into three types: virtual terminals (on boot or as presented by [C-]A-F<N>), β€˜true’ terminals (exposed on serial ports), and pseudoterminals (controlled by other programs). Essentially, you have a virtual terminal running X running Xterm which controls a pseudoterminal with tmux attached controlling another pseudoterminal.

    Login shells are a special flag set when launching shells, sometimes. They typically read different settings (e.g. Bash reads ~/.bash_profile instead of ~/.bashrc). Most shells will launch as a login shell if their command name (argv[0]) begins with a hyphen; Bash also allows explicit bash -l to run a login shell.

  • source
  • parent