6
Farewell, B1069! (thelemmy.club)
submitted 2 months ago* by [M] to c/spaceflightmemes@sh.itjust.works
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Credit: Echo5550

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

why it died? 🥺

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    The company said this would be the boosters final mission “Due to the additional performance needed to launch these payloads to geosynchronous transfer orbit.”

    https://spaceflightnow.com/2026/07/21/live-coverage-spacex-to-launch-novel-geosynchronous-robotic-servicing-satellite-on-decade-long-mission/

    Sounds like they're using all of the booster's fuel to launch the payload higher instead of saving some so it can return and land.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    I wonder how the math works out for expending an old core vs launching a fully recovered FH. Additional cost of the FH side boosters and recovery fleet ops, vs the opportunity cost of lost future launch income from that core - future maintenance.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago

    a fully recovered FH

    If I recall correctly, they've not had great success with this in the past. The booster either came in too hot or fell off the droneship on the way home. If you try and fail to recover the centre core, you might as well have just expended a single-stick Falcon 9.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent