209
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2026
209 points (99.1% liked)
Technology
86590 readers
2935 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I know where you're coming from, but the problem with your statement assumes getting rid of facial rec would solve the problem. There already exists multiple ways for people to be tracked that doesn't involve a camera. One of them being Bluetooth ID tracking (we all carry phones). And it's fairly better and cheaper to implement. You need to have devices in various places (like you would with a camera), but you don't even need to see a person's face, nevermind a good angle of their face (which is a constant issue with facial rec). As long as the person is within signal distance of a node, you know where they are/been.
I'm not justifying the use of facial recognition here (there ARE proper uses like organizing a digital photo album or access control at a facility). All I'm trying to point out is that awful people will find ways to use tools for awful reasons.
The issue isn't the tool, the issue is a deeper problem in society. No one should want to use a tool in this way.
Agree 100%