1
Why does Matrix give servers the option to prevent disabling read receipts and why does the official matrix server do it? (thelemmy.club)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/matrix@programming.dev
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

What the fuck?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Basically the only thing actually encrypted in matrix e2e are the message contents itself. All other possible types of associated metadata, aren't.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Is there a given reason for this? Is it something they're working on changing? I know very little about cybersecurity, but that sounds like a suboptimal situation.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
    • There are efforts to encrypt more information and metadata, and to reduce the extent metadata can be correlated
    • The primary reason that things aren't encrypted is to allow the server to perform necessary parts of the protocol, like deciding who is in a room, what the title of the room is and to whom should messages be delivered.
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •