It's not false. I previously worked for a facial recognition company. Every single facial recognition system uses a photo (or series of photos) to extract the mathematical representation of a face. But literally every single system uses a different algorithm. Once they make the extraction, that data is 100% useless to anyone other than that vendor/system.

Ultimately it doesn't matter, because the source photo is what's more valuable, since that can be used by any system to generate a face model of an individual and it can be read/seen/interpreted by people also.

it also assumes that we have uploaded pictures of ours to the internet.

Hence why I said "If you've ever uploaded a photo of yourself".

that won't make it known where will I be at any later point in time.

I'm sorry, what??

You have no idea what I did.

The company I worked for built firearms detection for facilities that prohibited weapons, and facial recognition for access control systems. We even built a version of our facial rec system for a school that had a problem with an alarmingly high amount of sex offenders living in the immediate area. So that system was built explicitly to keep sex offenders away from the school.

Our system was literally built with security and privacy in mind. We insisted on air gapped networks for the architecture. We were asked by several clients if we could make the system accessible via "the cloud" and we said no. We were asked if we could build a function to catalogue all faces seen to build up a database and provide insights if someone at a later point caused an issue and the historical data could be reviewed to see what they did in the past. We said no.

The company doesn't exist anymore (covid killed us, we were a very small company and not US American), and our IP stayed with us. I also know for a fact that no one else has implemented some of the cutting edge methodology we used.

So no. I didn't help build "this problem", because nothing I've built is being used anymore. And if anything, we helped hold the tide on some of the stuff used today. If we had a different ethical approach we probably could have gone farther and faster with the company, but we didn't.

And as a side point: you basically admitted that you used the downvote button as an irrational emotional outlet instead of actually reading what I said as valuable insight. I pointed out that a photo of your face literally counts as "biometric data", and that it's something people should be more guarded about. The mathematical model generated from your face is frankly irrelevant. It's worthless outside of the system that generated it, and actually worthless without the photo of the person. Because without the photo, there's no way to validate the detection.

So good job with your baseless hate. We certainly don't have enough of that going around.