▲ 54 ▼ Not a single one (thelemmy.club) submitted 3 months ago by einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 131 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] crimson_iris@piefed.social 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Nothing, because they have only space for 6500 t high-level nuclear waste which is already reserved for Finnish nuclear waste, whereas Germany has like 17.000 t. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] crimson_iris@piefed.social 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago Now I get what you mean. I should have phrased this better. I meant "no such thing as safe long term storage [could be determined in Germany yet]". Which means, as of today, they could not find a safe location in Germany to build such a storage facility like Finland did. Germany is densely populated and the ground/earth is mostly unsuited for long time storage. permalink fedilink source parent [–] einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works [S] -3 points 3 months ago https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkIa99touXQ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago (2 children) Nothing, because they have only space for 6500 t high-level nuclear waste which is already reserved for Finnish nuclear waste, whereas Germany has like 17.000 t. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] crimson_iris@piefed.social 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago Now I get what you mean. I should have phrased this better. I meant "no such thing as safe long term storage [could be determined in Germany yet]". Which means, as of today, they could not find a safe location in Germany to build such a storage facility like Finland did. Germany is densely populated and the ground/earth is mostly unsuited for long time storage. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] crimson_iris@piefed.social 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago Now I get what you mean. I should have phrased this better. I meant "no such thing as safe long term storage [could be determined in Germany yet]". Which means, as of today, they could not find a safe location in Germany to build such a storage facility like Finland did. Germany is densely populated and the ground/earth is mostly unsuited for long time storage. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago Now I get what you mean. I should have phrased this better. I meant "no such thing as safe long term storage [could be determined in Germany yet]". Which means, as of today, they could not find a safe location in Germany to build such a storage facility like Finland did. Germany is densely populated and the ground/earth is mostly unsuited for long time storage. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works [S] -3 points 3 months ago https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkIa99touXQ permalink fedilink source parent
