Gladaed comments on Not a single one

submitted 3 months ago by einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works to c/science_memes@mander.xyz

131 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

Having become a carbon neutral economy a couple years ago since we obviously adhere to the Paris agreement this does not seem like a good solution as we already (would have to have) deployed solutions based on current technology.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)

Agree that we can get to carbon neutral / carbon negative with current tech.

I do think making plans based on having it are foolish at best.

But I do think we need to keep working on research of it. If we ever hope to achieve a world with "electricity too cheap to meter", nuclear fusion is the key to it. (That and dyson spheres, but that's kinda not in scope of discussion).

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 3 points 3 months ago

Electric power too cheap to meter exists and it's called solar power.

Renewables are dirt cheap. Hoping for even more abundance is forgetting that it's already ridiculous.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent