591
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by streetfestival@lemmy.ca to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

People in general always tend to have fewer kids during hard times, whatever they perceive as hard times. But some people clearly keep having them, because the human race still exists even though we've always had plagues, wars, famines, etc. They kept having kids through the Ice Age FFS. There's no point saying people now "aren't having kids" - of course they are, just not as much as before.

[-] arrow74@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 days ago

Many nations being below replacement level is certainly new.

Generally humanity has stayed around replacement level or grown exponentially (especially post agriculture)

It's a shift that's only disastrous because of how we organize our society. It should be good to have less people to provide for, but it just doesn't work with this idea of exponential growth

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yes I think adjusting to the new pattern seems more sensible than trying to maintain exponential growth because it's what we're used to.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
591 points (98.2% liked)

Political Memes

2511 readers
86 users here now

Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS