1111
It's rigged
(thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
1111 points (98.4% liked)
Work Reform
16834 readers
342 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Correct me if I'm wrong here.
But isn't it cumulative?
They pay a certain tax rate on a certain amount of money. So they're paying 12.2% within the bracket that covers that amount of earnings, then an additional 2.2% only on the income that falls into the next bracket.
So they're paying the same rate as everyone else on the income within each bracket, right?
I'm sure these medical billionaires made their money in the worst way possible, but to accumulate that kind of wealth they're generally not earning it as ordinary income.
"Buy, borrow, die" largely avoids income taxes because loans aren't taxable income.
The issue is far more devious than simply taxing a higher income bracket at a higher percentage.
There has never been a more important issue in our time than the wealth gap and economic inequality.
This is mostly right but I think missing the point. It's not 12.2% on the first bracket and 2.2% on the second. It's 12.4% on the first $184,000 and ZERO On the rest. The 2.2% is not the marginal rate they are currently paying, it is the effective rate if you add up all the taxes paid divided by all the income. It's so low because people with salaries beyond 184k stop having to pay any of this tax on their next marginal dollar.
And the reason this is a big deal is because this tax revenue is what is used to fund social security payments for older folks. The social security reserve fund that is running out (which will result in a significant reduction in payment to these old folks) could possibly be all or mostly funded if we made people making more than $184,000 pay the same rate as everyone else.
Damn. How are we not French Revolution-ing these fucks?
love island, throwback nikes, the return of the mcrib, the soap opera of the trump presidencies; they’re keeping us entertained and mollified
Panem et circences.
Similar amount maybe, not same rate. If the first 100k is taxes at 30% and the rest is at 2%, someone making 100k pays 30k. But someone making 1 million also pays around 30k + 18k maybe. But for the 100k person the total paid was 30%, and for the 1 million person the total paid was maybe 5% of their total. Warsaw away lower.