1141
It's rigged (thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] snooggums@piefed.world 18 points 1 month ago

Social security benefits shouldn't be proportional to income, it should be a set amount that everyone is eligible and it should be collected proportional to income including capital gains and everything else.

[-] chisel@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

That's a UBI, not Social Security. It's a great idea! But it's not Social Security.

[-] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

If that were UBI then I would get paid before I was 67.

[-] snooggums@piefed.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Social security paying retirement and disability payments is different from UBI. I am simply saying paying in should be proportional to income but the benefits should not.

A CEO and minimum wage worker should get the same social security benefits and they would be higher than they currently are if we taxed the Epstein class properly.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
1141 points (98.5% liked)

Work Reform

17181 readers
1213 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS