I did cite one case. I can find the quote if you like, but I also pointed out that your argument is a logical informal fallacy. That is a valid way to contribute to a discussion. Here: https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/gurgaon-police-japan-tourist-social-media-justice-10225392/

"Technology has changed the architecture of accountability. In the twentieth century, oversight flowed primarily through institutions: courts, legislatures, and professional media. In the twenty-first century, it flows through networks. A single video can expose misconduct, contradict official statements, and mobilize public scrutiny within hours. " https://thefulcrum.us/media-technology/right-to-record-police

Put that goalpost back where it was, we’re talking about meta glasses and the inappropriate use

And I brought up the right of men to enter women's spaces and the inappropriate use of that right. It is not my fault that you can't follow a very simple train of thought.

but, to answer crazy with crazy

Again, your inability to understand might make reason seem crazy, but go off king.

if, for some miraculous reason, trans people gained the ability to record with their eyes and upload it to the internet, we’d have to probably do something about it,

What about if trans people physically and sexually abuse women in women's spaces? What then?