794
Reframing smart glasses as 'pervert glasses' (this.weekinsecurity.com)
submitted 1 month ago* by to c/privacy@lemmy.world
172 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Smart glasses equipped with cameras, microphones, and AI are a creeping privacy and security nightmare, prompting backlash.

And rightfully so.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

WELL GOLLY GEE I GUESS THAT FUCKIN ENDS THE DISCUSSION HUH?

No, it doesn't. https://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.115

See, there's actually laws about this shit that you "no expectation of privacy" creeps love to ignore. And these tools are making it easier.

Why do you want to make it easier to creep on little girls?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    What the fuck is wrong with you? Now you're projecting pedophilia. Why are you thinking about fucking kids? What the fuck is your problem?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] 1 point 1 month ago* (1 child)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    yeah it's so crazy to care about women and children being creeped upon.

    do you even think about what you write?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    You have no expectation of privacy in public. It's not my fault you're too fucking stupid to understand that. You're the one that keeps mentioning women and children when literally all I said was that you have no expectation of privacy in public because you have no expectation of privacy in public you phenomenal fucking moron, I never said a fucking thing about any fucking thing else and you're losing your dumb fucking mind because you're a screeching twat that can't read. Go fuck yourself you psychotic shit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    PRIVACY NO, PROTECTION FROM VOYERISM YES.

    https://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.115

    STOP MAKING IT SEEM OK TO CREEP ON PEOPLE IT'S ACTUALLY FUCKING ILLEGAL.

    You phenomenal dolt, why are you advocating for women and children to be abused you dumb fucking shit

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Ok you preponderously ignorant fuckass, where did I ever mention voyeurism? Where did I ever make a value judgement about camera glasses. You miserable psychotic fucking creep, I literally only ever said you don't have an expectation of privacy in public and you lost your fucking mind. You dumb fucking piece of shit, learn to fucking read you fucking stupid fuck. Anybody that screams pedophile with no provocation shouldn't be participating in the public. Dumb twat, go fuck yourself.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent