According to Bethesda Support, even the Intel Arc A770 GPU does not meet Starfield's PC minimum requirements.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 77 points 3 years ago (26 children)

This must be one of the worst-developed games in the last ten years. If a high-end PC can't run it, they did a shitty job designing it, and the graphics are not great. They spent zero time optimizing it.

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    I've played it for 50 hours now and have yet to experience a single issue. My PC is pretty beefy but nothing special. 12th Gen Intel processor, Radeon 6950 XT GPU, 16GB memory. Pretty bog standard gaming PC.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    That's a $700 GPU that's bearly a year old.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Yeah it's a mid tier card, like I said beefy but nothing special.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    It's far from mid tier. Midtier would be a 6600 XT.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Idk if arc was a thing when they were developing this one after FO4 at the time. Not defending, just saying that might’ve been more of a factor combined with Intel not having much of a market share at the current moment. Willing to bet they’ll get it working following release after a few months. Speculating though!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago (12 children)

    I have a 3070 and it runs great. The graphics look good on ultra/high settings too. I don’t even think the 3070 is considered high end anymore

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Runs fine on my 3060ti also. This game is being brigaded really hard on Lemmy for some reason. It's by no means a perfect game but I've been having enough fun to keep going and I've had zero issues running it on ultra. Like actually zero. Shrug.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Good to know my 3060ti would be able to handle it. I’m not planning on getting it just because first person games and I do not get on well, but it’s good to know because this is what most games coming out now will be at.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    Different standards I guess. I have a 5800X and 3080 Ti and I have trouble getting it to run at 90 FPS minimum outdoors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (5 children)
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    AKSCHULLY you cannot have fun because we former redditors decided so!!!

    Just ignore them, some of these guys will claim a game sub 144 fps is unplayable, even in single player.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    It does make me laugh how entitled the PCMR has become, people complaining that they can only get a game running at around 80 FPS, well beyond what's needed for smooth gameplay, and the like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment