Friendship ended with Mullvad. Fediverse: Now IVPN is my best friend.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

But I wouldnโ€™t trust anyone on the sole basis that they claim they subscribe to a specific ideology.

Almost as dumb as rejecting someone based on their ideology alone? Or do you have any resources to prove their journalism is biased apart from that "they are socialists". You have been out here for days shitting on this news paper "Flamman" that you yourself have admitted to hearing for the first time

Nor have I ever heard of this publication โ€œFlammanโ€, that also claims to be some old socialist newspaper.

You have not presented a single source as to why they are biased apart from them being "socialists". You have also been going around trying to shit on other resources as much as you can, blaming people of not providing enough resources and saying things like "misinformation is how propaganda spreads". These are all applications of the "accusation in the mirror".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    Sure. Have i rejected something on the sole basis of someones ideology? No.

    The fact they are a political publication means by definition that they're biased.

    If they weren't, they'd be politically neutral.

    It's sad, that this has to be explained to you.

    I did indeed hear about them for the first time recently, and the more i learned about them. The worse it got. They're not considered reliable

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Sure. Have i rejected something on the sole basis of someones ideology? No.

    Yes you have rejected the credibility of a publisher you have encountered for the first time solely based on their ideology.

    the more i learned about them

    Provide resources about what you have learned about them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [โ€“] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    I did thanks (and agree with ethical media violations presented here). The very fact that they are audited by a media ombudsmen however goes on to prove that your statement

    โ€œFlammanโ€ however is closer to Alex Jones Info Wars

    does not hold up. And the fact that nothing they have said in the previous article (i.e "parasites" or the donations) was fabricated remains.

  • source
  • parent