Gaming

gaming@lemmy.ml

28,852 readers

1,188 active

67 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.

founded 7 years ago

moderators

Metallinatus@lemmy.ml

peternile@lemmy.ml

Bethesda says most of Starfield's 1000+ planets are dull on purpose because 'when the astronauts went to the moon, there was nothing there' but 'they certainly weren't bored' (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 3 years ago by thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca to c/gaming@lemmy.ml

252 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Sure Todd, lol

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] maltasoron@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 years ago (1 child)

Couldn't they just have copied the locations a few times and changed up the doors and chests by hand? Seems like an easy fix.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Otome-chan@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago

yes. I haven't played the game so idk the details of what's up. but at 1k+ planet-sized spaces it's hard to have a team go over that by hand. Planets are large. But I have no doubt that bethesda team was probably super lazy as well.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent