you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 3 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Ah. I see. You're thinking to let the fiberglass cables lose on top of permafrost like it's a hose from a shed.

    If you're able, you can learn why that is a bad idea online. There is plethora of reasons why fiberglass cables usually go underground.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago* (6 children)

    I genuinely don't understand you. Ok so they go underground next to a road - then what? They freeze and explode? Or do you imply we can't afford to dig ditches but can afford to fire rockets?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Are you implying there's a large amount of people not connected by roads? How many you think?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    I literally direct you again to fucking google that, because the first response from Google literally tells you why that will not fucking work.

    Are you so entitled that you demand we copy paste it for your pleasure.

    The google will include the over-the-air elevated fibreglass that costs 20x more per mile than anywhere else, why it would cost one third of that number a year to maintain, why it cannot go underground (because of permafrost melting when being dug up and turning into mud and bog and sinking the installation and million other things), thst there are no roads in many places at all, etc. etc.

    Your laziness is offending.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment