593
Data centers emitting more CO2 than thought: study (japantoday.com)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

And I would be interested on how they are referbing the equipment and selling for a profit

My understanding is that an e-waste recycling company is contracted to take all the old equipment. The original company can say they've recycled it, record it as such, and doesn't care what's done with the equipment after that - whether that be reselling it, recycling it, whatever. The e-waste company is the one that handles finding the useful stuff and refurbishing it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Interesting, maybe w/ my company they just don't want to risk it w/ 3rd party (customers) equipment. Or more likely we don't have the authority to tell the recycler that because its not our gear?

    I know with our gear we ship it back to depot when its no longer in use as we have other centers that can use it. Or the repair group will part it out for future repairs.

    I will say it chaps my ass seeing a roll away taken away w/ 5-10 million dollars of gear to be crushed.

    Same w/ the cardboard, I asked for a bailer, too dangerous, denied. Asked for a cardboard only dumpster, again denied. We had a local charity picking it up as they made a few bucks off it. That got nixed for liability concerns... I gave up at that point.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The big issue is that there's no risk and hardly any cost to the landfill, while there's a bit of work and thinking required for reuse, with not much more benefit than that it's doing the right thing.

    And you don't get to become a capitalist overlord for doing the right thing.

    It's high time that tax codes and regulation make dumping e-waste and unsorted trash extremely expensive.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I agree on the risk aspect and that was the driving force. I had more examples I got from the exec's like "What if one of these old servers burn a house down? Who you think they are going to sue".

    Also on the recycling side that there are checks in place that if say my company says "no" to refurb that they shred the servers up and recycle the bits they can.

    But something has to give, over my career I have seen so much just be carted off to the landfill it would make you sick. And I worked small data centers. Nothing like what they are proposing now.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago*

    Yeah, that's mostly a regulation/legal incentives situation, combined with lack of education on the side of the execs.

    It is possible to sell devices as "defective", even if they aren't defective. That way you don't have warranty or other legal obligations.

    Similar story with the "Scrap the whole device for data privacy reasons". That's not a thing. Scrapping the storage media, sure, totally. Scrapping the mainboard, case and power supply? That's crap.

    But the main issue is that there's no incentive for companies to reuse devices versus scrapping them. So they scrap the whole thing without regards to anything else, because it's a single decision that requires no further thought und it's cheap enough that it doesn't matter.

    If they'd have to pay for full recycling cost, so the cost for actually turning 100% of the device back into usable raw components, then they will instantly start giving those away for free.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent